Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35680273›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

Nurturing care during COVID-19: a rapid review of early evidence.

Kerrie Proulx, Rachel Lenzi-Weisbecker, Rachel Hatch, Kristy Hackett, Carina Omoeva, Vanessa Cavallera, Bernadette Daelmans, Tarun Dua

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Kerrie ProulxResearch and Evaluation, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA kerrie.proulx@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0267-9021
Rachel Lenzi-WeisbeckerResearch and Evaluation, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rachel HatchResearch and Evaluation, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kristy HackettResearch and Evaluation, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3969-659X
Carina OmoevaResearch and Evaluation, FHI 360, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Vanessa CavalleraDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Use, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5623-9721
Bernadette DaelmansDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tarun DuaDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Use, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Family Health International 360 · USAddiction Switzerland · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant changes to family life, society and essential health and other services. A rapid review of evidence was conducted to examine emerging evidence on the effects of the pandemic on three components of nurturing care, including responsive caregiving, early learning, and safety and security.

designTwo academic databases, organisational websites and reference lists were searched for original studies published between 1 January and 25 October 2020. A single reviewer completed the study selection and data extraction with verification by a second reviewer.

interventionsWe included studies with a complete methodology and reporting on quantitative or qualitative evidence related to nurturing care during the pandemic. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies reporting on outcomes related to responsive caregiving, early learning, and safety and security were included.

resultsThe search yielded 4410 citations in total, and 112 studies from over 30 countries met our eligibility criteria. The early evidence base is weighted towards studies in high-income countries, studies related to caregiver mental health and those using quantitative survey designs. Studies reveal issues of concern related to increases in parent and caregiver stress and mental health difficulties during the pandemic, which was linked to harsher and less warm or responsive parenting in some studies. A relatively large number of studies examined child safety and security and indicate a reduction in maltreatment referrals. Lastly, studies suggest that fathers' engagement in caregiving increased during the early phase of the pandemic, children's outdoor play and physical activity decreased (while screen time increased), and emergency room visits for child injuries decreased.

conclusionThe results highlight key evidence gaps (ie, breastfeeding support and opportunities for early learning) and suggest the need for increased support and evidence-based interventions to ensure young children and other caregivers are supported and protected during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19CaregiversChildChild, PreschoolHumansPandemicsParentingParentsChild protectionCommunity child healthCOVID-19Depression & mood disorders

Identifiers

PMID35680273
PMCPMC9184993
OpenAlexW4281651616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.