ArticleBMJ open2022
Community paramedicine: cost-benefit analysis and safety evaluation in paramedical emergency services in rural areas - a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Economic Impact of Community Paramedics Within Emergency Medical Services: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of community paramedicine service on prehospital time intervals in rural Norway: a quasi-experimental study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Mobile Integrated Health Transitional Care Program to Reduce Readmissions: Findings From a Quasi-Experimental Design.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Observational
- Patient flow and safety after implementing a community paramedicine service: a quasi-experimental study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Competence expected from advanced-level paramedics by emergency medical services managers in Finland: a modified Delphi study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- A qualitative RE-AIM evaluation of an embedded community paramedicine program in an Ontario Family Health Team.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- What do community paramedics in Germany do regarding the care of older people? A retrospective, descriptive analysis of low-acuity cases.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the current knowledge and possibly identify gaps in the knowledge base for cost-benefit analysis and safety concerning community paramedicine in rural areas.
designScoping review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane and Embase up to December 2020. STUDY SELECTION: All English studies involving community paramedicine in rural areas, which include cost-benefit analysis or safety evaluation. DATA EXTRACTION: This scoping review follows the methodology developed by Arksey and O'Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We systematically searched for all types of studies in the databases and the reference lists of key studies to identify studies for inclusion. The selection process was in two steps. First, two reviewers independently screened 2309 identified articles for title and abstracts and second performed a full-text review of 24 eligible studies for inclusion.
resultsThree articles met the inclusion criteria concerning cost-benefit analysis, two from Canada and one from USA. No articles met the inclusion criteria for safety evaluation.
conclusionThere are knowledge gaps concerning safety evaluation of community paramedicine in rural areas. Three articles were included in this scoping review concerning cost-benefit analysis, two of them showing positive cost-effectiveness with community paramedicine in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.