Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35680253›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Building a practice-based research network for healthcare integration: a protocol paper for a mixed-method project.

Sanne Peters, Samantha Paubrey Chakraborty, Christopher Barton, Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss, Danielle Mazza, Maria De Leon-Santiago, Timothy Staunton-Smith, Grant Russell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. SOARNet: Establishing an older adult focused practice-based research network.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne PetersDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6235-1752
Samantha Paubrey ChakrabortyDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-4532
Christopher BartonDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth Ann SturgissSchool of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-4060
Danielle MazzaDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Maria De Leon-SantiagoDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Timothy Staunton-SmithDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Grant RussellDepartment of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia grant.russell@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-2355
Monash University · AUAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPractice-based research networks (PBRNs) are sustained collaborations between healthcare professionals, researchers and members of the community that develop, conduct and report on research relevant to local needs. While PBRNs have traditionally been focused towards primary care practices and their patients, there has been increasing interest in how they may help facilitate healthcare integration. Yet, little is known on the ways in which PBRNs can best integrate with the broader healthcare system, in particular Advanced Health Research and Translation Centres. The overall project aim is to build a sustainable collaboration between a PBRN and an Advanced Health Research and Translation Centre to generate a research platform suitable for planning, undertaking and translating research to improve care across the healthcare continuum. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will use a developmental evaluation design. Our iterative approach will be informed by a programme logic model and consists of: preparation work (pre-implementation assessment, literature review, community and stakeholder engagement), adaptation and building for a sustainable collaboration (strategy for recruitment and sustainment of members) and planning for network action (designing and implementing priority initiatives, monitoring and follow-up). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This project was approved by the Monash Health ethics committee (ERM Reference Number: 76281; Monash Health Ref: RES-21-0000-392L) and the Monash University Human Research ethics committee (Reference Number: 29786). Dissemination will take place via various channels, including relevant national and international committees and conferences, peer-reviewed journals and social media. Continuous dissemination to and communication with all participants in this project as well as other relevant stakeholders will help strengthen and sustain the network.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedHealth Services AdministrationHealth FacilitiesHealth ServicesHumansPrimary Health CareResearch DesignResearch PersonnelStakeholder Participationhealth services administration & managementorganisation of health servicesprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35680253
PMCPMC9185579
OpenAlexW4282946892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.