ArticleHealth literacy research and practice2022
Is Your WebLitLegit? Finding Safe and Good Health Information on the Internet.
Article in Health literacy research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health Information Literacy as a Determinant of Digital Self-Efficacy.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
- Quality and Misinformation About Health Conditions in Online Peer Support Groups: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Become a Health Literacy Champion: Strategies to Promote Health Literacy in Athletic Training.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Impacts of educational interventions of librarian instruction on health information seeking attitudes and behaviors in an employee wellness program.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2024Article
- Electronic Health Literacy Among Baby Boomers: A Typology.Health literacy research and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere exists a paucity of literature about teenager health literacy in general and teenagers are likely to turn to the internet for health information. Therefore, they need good e-health literacy to properly understand and apply the information obtained. Yet, many have limited e-health literacy, lacking the knowledge and skills to filter and distinguish reliable from unreliable health information and searches return large amounts of information, making it difficult to recognize whether information is reputable and raising concerns regarding teenagers' safety. Brief Description of Activity: We developed a toolkit in collaboration with community-based organizations serving teenagers and teenagers themselves usable with brief training to present a 1-hour, interactive workshop. We transformed current adult information for locating and appraising online health information into a teenager friendly format using relevant health topics to engage participants. IMPLEMENTATION: We met teenagers in teenager-friendly settings where they already gather to engage them and leverage the relationship fostered within those settings to bridge positive and negative social determinant influences on health literacy and e-health literacy as well as cross potential cultural, economic, political, and demographic barriers. Using the "train the trainer" method to build sustainability, we trained teenagers and group leaders to use the toolkit to run workshops with teenagers and placed the components in an easily available online format.
resultsAfter completing the workshop, teenager participants expressed a high level of confidence in using Medline Plus, locating health information online, identifying Truth versus Trash and making health decisions. Most teenagers reported they would recommend the WebLitLegit workshop to their friends and it improved their ability to find credible online health information. LESSONS LEARNED: The workshop's practical application provided participants with real-life examples for evaluating online information using the "LEGIT" acronym. The integration of this community-based program fostered relationships between the teenager participants, community organizations, and university students and faculty. All of the organizations involved benefited through exposure to health literacy concepts and knowledge of evaluation criteria, which may help expand e-health literacy in the community because the students, teenagers, and community partners are able to sustainably share the toolkit within their social network. [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.