Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35679613›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2023

Simultaneously Developing Interventions for Low-/Middle-Income and High-Income Settings: Considerations and Opportunities.

Zachary G Baker, Manka Nkimbeng, Pearl Ed G Cuevas, Ana R Quiñones, Harmeet Kaur Kang, Joseph E Gaugler, Ladson Hinton, Laura N Gitlin, Tetyana P Shippee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evidence Map of Non-Pharmacological Dementia Care Partner Interventions Implemented in the US: Gaps and Impact Opportunities.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zachary G BakerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5345-7643
Manka NkimbengDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7414-921X
Pearl Ed G CuevasSchool of Nursing, Centro Escolar University, San Miguel, Manila, Philippines.
Ana R QuiñonesDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-7734
Harmeet Kaur KangChitkara School of Health Sciences, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Joseph E GauglerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4797-485X
Ladson HintonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Laura N GitlinCollege of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tetyana P ShippeeDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1804-2527

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Andrea L Gilmore-Bykovskyi · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
Addressing the Needs of Key Subgroups of Caregivers of Persons with Dementia After Loss Using Self-Determination Theory: A Mixed Methods ApproachR00AG073463 · NIA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BAKER, ZACHARY G · 2023 to 2025
$722k
Addressing the Needs of Key Subgroups of Caregivers of Persons with Dementia After Loss Using Self-Determination Theory: A Mixed Methods ApproachK99AG073463 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BAKER, ZACHARY G · 2021 to 2022
$180k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most older adults reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but most research dollars spent on interventions to improve the lives of older adults are awarded to researchers in high-income countries (HICs). One approach to improve the implementation of evidence-based innovations for older adults in LMICs is designing interventions that are relevant to LMICs and HICs simultaneously. We propose that researchers in HICs could partner with stakeholders in an LMIC throughout the intervention design process to better position their intervention for the implementation in that LMIC. We provide an example study from an adaptation of the Resources for Enhancing Caregiver Health II in Vietnam, which did not use this strategy but may have benefited from this strategy. We then turn to several considerations that are important for researchers to contemplate when incorporating this strategy. Finally, we explore incentives for creating interventions that are relevant to both HICs and LMICs for funders, intervention designers, and intervention receivers. Although this is not the only strategy to bring interventions to LMICs, it may represent another tool in researchers' toolboxes to help expedite the implementation of efficacious interventions in LMICs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesPovertyAgedHumansResearch PersonnelHealth equityImplementation scienceInternational collaborationsResearch translationTeams/interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID35679613
PMCPMC10028230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.