Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35679611›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

Technical Note: A procedure to place urinary catheters in 1- and 6-week-old preweaned Holstein heifer calves for the in vivo evaluation of intestinal permeability.

Guadalupe Ceja, Jacquelyn P Boerman, Rafael C Neves, Nicholas S Johnson, Jon P Schoonmaker, Matthew W Jorgensen, Jay S Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guadalupe CejaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Jacquelyn P BoermanDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Rafael C NevesDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Nicholas S JohnsonMercy Hospital St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA.
Jon P SchoonmakerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Matthew W JorgensenLivestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Jay S JohnsonLivestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5773-4142
Agricultural Research Service · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USMercy Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral administration of indigestible markers and subsequent urine collection is a useful method to determine in vivo gastrointestinal tract (GIT) permeability in cattle for research purposes. However, urine sampling techniques often rely on total waste collection, which reduces the ability to perform more frequent sampling and obtain accurate volumes and sterile samples. An alternative is urethral catheterization, though the feasibility of this technique has not been thoroughly tested in preweaned Holstein heifer calves. The study objective was to develop a urethral catheter placement procedure in preweaned Holstein heifer calves for continuous and accurate urine collection to evaluate GIT permeability using an indigestible marker. Fifteen Holstein heifer calves had catheters placed at approximately 1 wk (8.0 ± 1.5 d) and 6 wk (40.0 ± 1.5 d) of age. During the procedure, calves were individually housed and restrained. The vulva was sterilized and then a sterile, lubricated speculum was inserted into the vagina. A sterile 0.09 cm diameter guidewire was guided into a lubricated, sterile 10 French Foley catheter. The catheter was inserted at approximately 5 through 7 cm into the urethral opening, guided into the bladder, and the catheter balloon was filled with 10 mL of water. The guidewire was removed, and urine flow confirmed correct placement before a 4-L urinary drainage bag was attached to the catheter. After catheterization (24 h), 1 L of chromium (Cr)-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid was orally dosed to the calves. Calf health observations were made six times over a 48-h period, and any occurrence of vaginal discharge, tissue discharge in catheter, bleeding, inflammation, or abnormal urine was considered a localized reaction. The proportion of localized reactions for each age group was determined using Microsoft Excel, and the total Cr output was analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX. Localized reactions occurred for 20.0% of the 1-wk-old calves and 13.3% of the 6-wk-old calves. In the first 4 h, urine was collected every 15 min, and there were no overall Cr output differences (P = 0.38; 10.28 ± 3.21 mg Cr) when comparing 1- and 6-wk-old calves. However, 1-wk-old calves tended (P = 0.08) to have greater overall Cr output at 480 min (19.2%) and 1,440 min (41.9%) when compared with 6-wk-old calves. In summary, urinary catheterization is a viable urinary collection method for the determination of in vivo GIT permeability in preweaned Holstein heifer calves.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal TractUrinary CathetersAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleDietFemaleIntestinesPermeabilityWeaningcalvesgastrointestinal permeabilityheiferspreweanedurine collection

Identifiers

PMID35679611
PMCPMC9387597
OpenAlexW4282913035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.