Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35679333›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

The lexical categorization model: A computational model of left ventral occipito-temporal cortex activation in visual word recognition.

Benjamin Gagl, Fabio Richlan, Philipp Ludersdorfer, Jona Sassenhagen, Susanne Eisenhauer, Klara Gregorova, Christian J Fiebach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Simultaneous Cortical Responses to Multiple Written Words.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Simultaneous cortical responses to multiple written words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reading reshapes stimulus selectivity in the visual word form area.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin GaglDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2339-6293
Fabio RichlanCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Philipp LudersdorferCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-5329
Jona SassenhagenDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-8621
Susanne EisenhauerDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2570-0604
Klara GregorovaDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3828-9386
Christian J FiebachDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-1721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterize the functional role of the left-ventral occipito-temporal cortex (lvOT) during reading in a quantitatively explicit and testable manner, we propose the lexical categorization model (LCM). The LCM assumes that lvOT optimizes linguistic processing by allowing fast meaning access when words are familiar and filtering out orthographic strings without meaning. The LCM successfully simulates benchmark results from functional brain imaging described in the literature. In a second evaluation, we empirically demonstrate that quantitative LCM simulations predict lvOT activation better than alternative models across three functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. We found that word-likeness, assumed as input into a lexical categorization process, is represented posteriorly to lvOT, whereas a dichotomous word/non-word output of the LCM could be localized to the downstream frontal brain regions. Finally, training the process of lexical categorization resulted in more efficient reading. In sum, we propose that word recognition in the ventral visual stream involves word-likeness extraction followed by lexical categorization before one can access word meaning.

Indexed as

Brain MappingOccipital LobeComputer SimulationMagnetic Resonance ImagingPattern Recognition, VisualTemporal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID35679333
PMCPMC9182256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.