Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35679240›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A comprehensive DNA barcode inventory of Austria's fish species.

Lukas Zangl, Sylvia Schäffer, Daniel Daill, Thomas Friedrich, Wolfgang Gessl, Marija Mladinić, Christian Sturmbauer, Josef Wanzenböck, Steven J Weiss, Stephan Koblmüller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Origin and Genetic Diversity ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lukas ZanglInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1175-564X
Sylvia SchäfferInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Daniel DaillInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Thomas FriedrichInstitute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9881-5392
Wolfgang GesslInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Marija MladinićDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-674X
Christian SturmbauerInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Josef WanzenböckResearch Department for Limnology, Mondsee, University of Innsbruck, Mondsee, Austria.
Steven J WeissInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Stephan KoblmüllerInstitute of Biology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1024-3220
University of Graz · ATBOKU University · ATUniversalmuseum Joanneum · ATUniversität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Austria is inhabited by more than 80 species of native and non-native freshwater fishes. Despite considerable knowledge about Austrian fish species, the latest Red List of threatened species dates back 15 years and a systematic genetic inventory of Austria's fish species does not exist. To fulfill this deficit, we employed DNA barcoding to generate an up-to-date and comprehensive genetic reference database for Austrian fish species. In total, 639 newly generated cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) sequences were added to the 377 existing records from the BOLD data base, to compile a near complete reference dataset. Standard sequence similarity analyses resulted in 83 distinct clusters almost perfectly reflecting the expected number of species in Austria. Mean intraspecific distances of 0.22% were significantly lower than distances to closest relatives, resulting in a pronounced barcoding gap and unique Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) for most of the species. Four cases of BIN sharing were detected, pointing to hybridization and/or recent divergence, whereas in Phoxinus spp., Gobio spp. and Barbatula barbatula intraspecific splits, multiple BINs and consequently cryptic diversity were observed. The overall high identification success and clear genetic separation of most of the species confirms the applicability and accuracy of genetic methods for bio-surveillance. Furthermore, the new DNA barcoding data pinpoints cases of taxonomic uncertainty, which need to be addressed in further detail, to more precisely assort genetic lineages and their local distribution ranges in a new National Red-List.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFishesAnimalsAustriaDNAFresh WaterPhylogenyDNA

Identifiers

PMID35679240
PMCPMC9182252
OpenAlexW4285506251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.