Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35679147›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

Risk-reducing surgery in unaffected individuals receiving cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system.

Sarah Knerr, Boya Guo, Kathleen F Mittendorf, Heather Spencer Feigelson, Marian J Gilmore, Gail P Jarvik, Tia L Kauffman, Erin Keast, Frances L Lynch, Kristin R Muessig and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah KnerrSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5461-6298
Boya GuoSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, USA.
Kathleen F MittendorfDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-9171
Heather Spencer FeigelsonInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-3740
Marian J GilmoreDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.
Gail P JarvikSchool of Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, USA.
Tia L KauffmanCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.
Erin KeastCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.
Frances L LynchCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.
Kristin R MuessigDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.
Sonia OkuyamaDivision of Oncology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA.
David L VeenstraThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, USA.
Jamilyn M ZeppDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.
Katrina A B GoddardDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Oregon, Portland, USA.
Beth DevineThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USUniversity of Washington · USUrban Institute · USDenver Health Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Exome sequencing in Diverse Populations in Colorado & OregonU01HG007292 · NHGRI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LEO, MICHAEL C, WILFOND, BENJAMIN SIMON · 2017 to 2021
$15.7M
Evolving Our Partnership: The CSER2 Centralized Support Coordinating CenterU24HG007307 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FULLERTON, STEPHANIE MALIA, JARVIK, GAIL PAIRITZ · 2017 to 2021
$5.8M
CSER RoRC Centralized Support Coordinating CenterU01HG007307 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BURKE, WYLIE G., JARVIK, GAIL PAIRITZ · 2013 to 2016
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007292NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007307NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG007307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGermline genetic testing enables primary cancer prevention, including through prophylactic surgery. We examined risk-reducing surgeries in unaffected individuals tested for hereditary cancer susceptibly between 2010 and 2018 in the Kaiser Permanente Northwest health system.

methodsWe used an internal genetic testing database to create a cohort of individuals who received tests including one or more high-penetrance hereditary cancer susceptibility gene. We then identified, after testing, bilateral mastectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and total hysterectomy procedures in electronic health record and claims data through 2019. We describe surgery utilization by genetic test results and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

resultsThe cohort included 1020 individuals, 16% with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in one or more of the following genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, APC, MUTYH, ATM, MSH2, PALB2, BRIP1, MLH1, MSH6, EPCAM, FLCN, RAD51C, RAD51D, or TP53. Among individuals with P/LP variants making them candidates for mastectomy, BSO, or hysterectomy per NCCN guidelines, 34% (33/97), 24% (23/94), and 8% (1/12), respectively, underwent surgery during follow-up. Fifty-three percent (18/37) of hysterectomies were among APC, BRCA1, and BRCA2 P/LP variant heterozygotes, typically concurrent with BSO. Three individuals with variants of uncertain significance (only) and 22 with negative results had prophylactic surgery after genetic testing.

conclusionsUptake of risk-reducing surgery following usual care genetic testing appears to be lower than in studies that actively recruit high-risk patients and provide testing and follow-up care in specialized settings. Factors in addition to genetic test results and NCCN guidelines motivate prophylactic surgery use and deserve further study.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansMastectomygenetic testinghereditary cancerprimary preventionprophylactic surgeryrisk management

Identifiers

PMID35679147
PMCPMC9308746
OpenAlexW4282922692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.