ArticleJMIR cardio2022
Surveillance of Arrhythmia in Patients After Myocardial Infarction Using Wearable Electrocardiogram Patch Devices: Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in JMIR cardio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute myocardial infarction may be associated with new-onset arrhythmias. Patients with myocardial infarction may manifest serious arrhythmias such as ventricular tachyarrhythmias or atrial fibrillation. Frequent, prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring can prevent devastating outcomes caused by these arrhythmias.
objectiveWe aimed to investigate the incidence of arrhythmias in patients following myocardial infarction using a patch-type device-AT-Patch (ATP-C120; ATsens).
methodsThis study is a nonrandomized, single-center, prospective cohort study. We evaluated 71 patients who had had a myocardial infarction and had been admitted to our hospital. The ATP-C120 device was attached to the patient for 11 days and analyzed by 2 cardiologists for new-onset arrhythmic events.
resultsOne participant was concordantly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. The cardiologists diagnosed atrial premature beats in 65 (92%) and 60 (85%) of 71 participants, and ventricular premature beats in 38 (54%) and 44 (62%) participants, respectively. Interestingly, 40 (56%) patients showed less than 2 minutes of sustained paroxysmal atrial tachycardia confirmed by both cardiologists. Among participants with atrial tachycardia, the use of β-blockers was significantly lower compared with patients without tachycardia (70% vs 90%, P=.04). However, different dosages of β-blockers did not make a significant difference.
conclusionsWearable ECG monitoring patch devices are easy to apply and can correlate symptoms and ECG rhythm disturbances in patients following myocardial infarction. Further study is necessary regarding clinical implications and appropriate therapies for arrhythmias detected early after myocardial infarction to prevent adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.