ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Prognostic value of ASPECTS on post-treatment diffusion-weighted imaging for acute ischemic stroke patients after endovascular thrombectomy: comparison with infarction volume.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel nomogram based on the patient's clinical data and CT signs to predict poor outcomes in AIS patients.PeerJ · 2025Article
- MRI of cerebral oedema in ischaemic stroke and its current use in routine clinical practice.Neuroradiology · 2024Review
- Spatial accuracy of computed tomography perfusion to estimate the follow-up infarct on diffusion-weighted imaging after successful mechanical thrombectomy.BMC neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the prognostic value of Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) on post-treatment diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and compare it with that of infarction volume.
methodsNinety-eight consecutive AIS patients who underwent EVT and post-treatment DWI were retrospectively enrolled. ASPECTS and infarction volume were evaluated based on post-treatment DWI, respectively. Good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days. Predictors of good clinical outcome were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Prognostic value of post-treatment DWI ASPECTS and infarction volume were assessed and compared using receiver-operating-characteristic curves and the DeLong method.
resultsFavorable outcome was achieved in 62 (63.3%) patients. A strong correlation was found between post-treatment DWI ASPECTS and infarction volume (ρ = -0.847). Due to strong correlation and potential collinearity, two multivariate logistic regression models were respectively developed which included post-treatment DWI ASPECTS or infarction volume. As a result, post-treatment DWI ASPECTS (OR, 2.401; 95%CI, 1.567-3.678; p < 0.001) and infarction volume (OR, 0.982; 95%CI, 0.846-0.998; p = 0.002) were both independent predictors of good clinical outcome. Setting post-treatment DWI ASPECTS ≥ 6 as a cut-off value, optimal performance (AUC = 0.836; sensitivity, 87.1%; specificity, 66.7%) could be obtained in predicting good clinical outcome, which was comparable with that of infarction volume (cut-off volume, ≤ 94.87 ml; AUC = 0.821; sensitivity, 90.3%; specificity, 55.6%).
conclusionsPost-treatment DWI ASPECTS might be a potential surrogate of infarction volume and be effective in predicting the clinical outcome of AIS patients after EVT. KEY POINTS: • Post-treatment DWI ASPECTS correlated significantly with infarction volume. • A post-treatment DWI ASPECTS ≥ 6 best predicts good outcomes for AIS patients after EVT. • Post-treatment DWI ASPECTS has the potential in substituting infarction volume in predicting the clinical outcome of AIS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.