Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35678824›Full record

ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2022

Exploitation of epigenetic variation of crop wild relatives for crop improvement and agrobiodiversity preservation.

Serena Varotto, Tamar Krugman, Riccardo Aiese Cigliano, Khalil Kashkush, Ankica Kondić-Špika, Fillipos A Aravanopoulos, Monica Pradillo, Federica Consiglio, Riccardo Aversano, Ales Pecinka and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Serena VarottoDepartment of Agronomy Animal Food Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università, 16 35020, Legnaro, Italy. serena.varotto@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5219-7157
Tamar KrugmanInstitute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy Ave 199, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
Riccardo Aiese CiglianoSequentia Biotech, SL, Carrer de València, 08009, Barcelona, Spain.
Khalil KashkushDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, Beersheba, 84105, Israel.
Ankica Kondić-ŠpikaInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Fillipos A AravanopoulosFaculty of Agriculture, Forest Science & Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GR54006, Greece.
Monica PradilloDepartment of Genetics, Physiology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Federica ConsiglioInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council (CNR), Via Università 133, 80055, Portici, Italy.
Riccardo AversanoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055, Portici, Italy.
Ales PecinkaInstitute of Experimental Botany, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Czech Acad Sci, Šlechtitelů 31, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Dragana MiladinovićInstitute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops · RSAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZInstitute of Biosciences and Bioresources · ITSOM Biotech (Spain) · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Haifa · ILUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop wild relatives (CWRs) are recognized as the best potential source of traits for crop improvement. However, successful crop improvement using CWR relies on identifying variation in genes controlling desired traits in plant germplasms and subsequently incorporating them into cultivars. Epigenetic diversity may provide an additional layer of variation within CWR and can contribute novel epialleles for key traits for crop improvement. There is emerging evidence that epigenetic variants of functional and/or agronomic importance exist in CWR gene pools. This provides a rationale for the conservation of epigenotypes of interest, thus contributing to agrobiodiversity preservation through conservation and (epi)genetic monitoring. Concepts and techniques of classical and modern breeding should consider integrating recent progress in epigenetics, initially by identifying their association with phenotypic variations and then by assessing their heritability and stability in subsequent generations. New tools available for epigenomic analysis offer the opportunity to capture epigenetic variation and integrate it into advanced (epi)breeding programmes. Advances in -omics have provided new insights into the sources and inheritance of epigenetic variation and enabled the efficient introduction of epi-traits from CWR into crops using epigenetic molecular markers, such as epiQTLs.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiodiversityEpigenomics

Identifiers

PMID35678824
PMCPMC9729329
OpenAlexW4281705304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.