Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35678712›Full record

SynthesisThe New phytologist2022

Associational resistance through intercropping reduces yield losses to soil-borne pests and diseases.

Victoria G A Chadfield, Sue E Hartley, Kelly R Redeker

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Biocontrol potential ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria G A ChadfieldDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Sue E HartleyDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5117-687X
Kelly R RedekerDepartment of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1903-2286
University of York · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Associational resistance to herbivore and pathogen attack is a well documented ecological phenomenon and, if applied to agriculture, may reduce impact of pests and diseases on crop yields without recourse to pesticides. The value of associational resistance through intercropping, planting multiple crops alongside each other, as a sustainable control method remains unclear, due to variable outcomes reported in the published literature. We performed a meta-analysis to provide a quantitative assessment of benefits of intercropping for target plant resistance to plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne diseases. We found that intercropping reduced damage to focal crops from nematodes by 40% and disease incidence by 55%. Intercropping efficacy varied with biological variables, such as field fertilisation status and intercrop family, and methodology, including whether study samples were potted or in fields. Nematode control using intercropping was sufficient to offset reductions in focal crop yield from intercrop presence, making intercropping a viable agricultural tool. We identify key drivers for underpinning the success of intercropping and indicate areas for future research to improve efficacy. This study also highlights the potential benefits of harnessing ecological knowledge on plant-enemy interactions for improving agricultural and landscape sustainability.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalSoilAgricultureSoil MicrobiologySoilagroecologyassociational resistanceco-cropsecological interactionsmeta-analysismeta-regressionnematodespathogen

Identifiers

PMID35678712
PMCPMC9545407
OpenAlexW4282920032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.