Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35678509›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2022

Validating visual evoked potentials as a preclinical, quantitative biomarker for remyelination efficacy.

Christian Cordano, Jung H Sin, Garrett Timmons, Hao H Yiu, Karin Stebbins, Caroline Guglielmetti, Andres Cruz-Herranz, Wendy Xin, Daniel Lorrain, Jonah R Chan and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MWF of the corpus callosum is a robust measure of remyelination: Results from the ReBUILD trial.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Myelination of the retinal nerve fibre layer: A case report.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Remyelination therapies are achievable in clinical practice-Yes.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Spironolactone Targets Retinoid X Receptor γ to Promote Myelin Sheath Regeneration.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spinal Cord Injury Remyelination: Pathways to Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian CordanoDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Jung H SinDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Garrett TimmonsDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Hao H YiuDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Karin StebbinsInception Sciences, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Caroline GuglielmettiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Andres Cruz-HerranzDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Wendy XinDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Daniel LorrainInception Sciences, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Jonah R ChanDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2176-1242
Ari J GreenDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USIncept (United States) · US

Funding

Establishing VEP as a quantitative biomarker for remyelination using transgenic models for gain and loss of functionR01NS105741 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GREEN, ARI J · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many biomarkers in clinical neuroscience lack pathological certification. This issue is potentially a significant contributor to the limited success of neuroprotective and neurorestorative therapies for human neurological disease-and is evident even in areas with therapeutic promise such as myelin repair. Despite the identification of promising remyelinating candidates, biologically validated methods to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy or provide robust preclinical evidence of remyelination in the CNS are lacking. Therapies with potential to remyelinate the CNS constitute one of the most promising and highly anticipated therapeutic developments in the pipeline to treat multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases. The optic nerve has been proposed as an informative pathway to monitor remyelination in animals and human subjects. Recent clinical trials using visual evoked potential have had promising results, but without unequivocal evidence about the cellular and molecular basis for signal changes on visual evoked potential, the interpretation of these trials is constrained. The visual evoked potential was originally developed and used in the clinic as a diagnostic tool but its use as a quantitative method for assessing therapeutic response requires certification of its biological specificity. Here, using the tools of experimental pathology we demonstrate that quantitative measurements of myelination using both histopathological measures of nodal structure and ultrastructural assessments correspond to visual evoked potential latency in both inflammatory and chemical models of demyelination. Visual evoked potential latency improves after treatment with a tool remyelinating compound (clemastine), mirroring both quantitative and qualitative myelin assessment. Furthermore, clemastine does not improve visual evoked potential latency following demyelinating injury when administered to a transgenic animal incapable of forming new myelin. Therefore, using the capacity for therapeutic enhancement and biological loss of function we demonstrate conclusively that visual evoked potential measures myelin status and is thereby a validated tool for preclinical verification of remyelination.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisRemyelinationAnimalsBiomarkersClemastineEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansMyelin SheathBiomarkersClemastineclemastinedemyelinationremyelinationvisual evoked potential

Identifiers

PMID35678509
PMCPMC10200282
OpenAlexW4281983199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.