ReviewAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2022
Understanding barriers to diagnosis in a rare, genetic disease: Delays and errors in diagnosing schwannomatosis.
Review in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Mind-Body Skills Training on Quality of Life for Geographically Diverse Adults With Neurofibromatosis: A Fully Remote Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Clinical and Imaging Phenotype of Schwannomatosis in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults.Cancers · 2026Article
- Building a framework for adolescent and young adult transition of care for patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis syndromes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Argo Delphi consensus statement on red flags and clinical gateways towards rare disease diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biallelic BRF2 mutations disrupt redox homeostasis as etiological factors in syndromic immunodeficiency and developmental disorders.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- SMARCB1-related schwannomatosis and other SMARCB1-associated phenotypes: clinical spectrum and molecular pathogenesis.Familial cancer · 2025Review
- Natural language processing of clinical notes enables early inborn error of immunity risk ascertainment.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024Article
- Article
- Coexistence of Genetic Diseases Is a New Clinical Challenge: Three Unrelated Cases of Dual Diagnosis.Genes · 2023Article
- Familial chylomicronemia syndrome in children: a diagnosis challenge.Translational pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosis of rare, genetic diseases is challenging, but conceptual frameworks of the diagnostic process can guide quality improvement initiatives. Using the National Academy of Medicine diagnostic framework, we assessed the extent of, and reasons for diagnostic delays and diagnostic errors in schwannomatosis, a neurogenetic syndrome characterized by nerve sheath tumors and chronic pain. We reviewed the medical records of 97 people with confirmed or probable schwannomatosis seen in two US tertiary care clinics. Time-to-event analysis revealed a median time from first symptom to diagnosis of 16.7 years (95% CI, 7.5-26.0 years) and median time from first medical consultation to diagnosis of 9.8 years (95% CI, 3.5-16.2 years). Factors associated with longer times to diagnosis included initial signs/symptoms that were intermittent, non-specific, or occurred at younger ages (p < 0.05). Thirty-six percent of patients were misdiagnosed; misdiagnoses were of underlying genetic condition (18.6%), pain etiology (16.5%), and nerve sheath tumor presence/pathology (11.3%) (non-mutually exclusive categories). One-fifth (19.6%) of patients had a clear missed opportunity for genetics workup that could have led to an earlier schwannomatosis diagnosis. These results suggest that interventions in clinician education, genetic testing availability, expert review of pathology findings, and automatic triggers for genetics referrals may improve diagnosis of schwannomatosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.