Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35678266›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling?

Yarmarly C Guerra Valero, Tavey Dorofaeff, Mark G Coulthard, Louise Sparkes, Jeffrey Lipman, Steven C Wallis, Jason A Roberts, Suzanne L Parker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yarmarly C Guerra ValeroUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6924-7237
Tavey DorofaeffUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mark G CoulthardPaediatric Intensive Care, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Louise SparkesPaediatric Intensive Care, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Jeffrey LipmanUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5965-9876
Steven C WallisUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2392-9854
Jason A RobertsUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-435X
Suzanne L ParkerUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6124-7475
The University of Queensland · AUChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AU

Funding

Australian National HealthAustralian National Health and Medical Research Council APP1142757Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship APP1048652Children's Hospital FoundationMedical Research Council APP1142757Medical Research Council Fellowship APP1048652The University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime in critically ill paediatric patients and provide dosing recommendations. We also sought to evaluate the use of capillary microsampling to facilitate data-rich blood sampling.

methodsPatients were recruited into a pharmacokinetic study, with cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime concentrations from plasma samples collected at 0, 0.5, 2, 4 and 6 h used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model using Pmetrics. Monte Carlo dosing simulations were tested using a range of estimated glomerular filtration rates (60, 100, 170 and 200 mL/min/1.73 m2) and body weights (4, 10, 15, 20 and 40 kg) to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets, including 100% ƒT>MIC with an MIC breakpoint of 1 mg/L.

resultsThirty-six patients (0.2-12 years) provided 160 conventional samples for inclusion in the model. The pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime were best described using one-compartmental model with first-order elimination. The clearance and volume of distribution for cefotaxime were 12.8 L/h and 39.4 L, respectively. The clearance for desacetylcefotaxime was 10.5 L/h. Standard dosing of 50 mg/kg q6h was only able to achieve the PK/PD target of 100% ƒT>MIC in patients >10 kg and with impaired renal function or patients of 40 kg with normal renal function.

conclusionsDosing recommendations support the use of extended or continuous infusion to achieve cefotaxime exposure suitable for bacterial killing in critically ill paediatric patients, including those with severe or deep-seated infection. An external validation of capillary microsampling demonstrated skin-prick sampling can facilitate data-rich pharmacokinetic studies.

Indexed as

CefotaximeCritical IllnessAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChildHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonte Carlo MethodAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximedesacetylcefotaxime

Identifiers

PMID35678266
PMCPMC9333413
OpenAlexW4281665975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.