Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35678214›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2022

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and the Need for a Meaningful Regulatory Plant Protection Product Testing Strategy.

Christopher J Sweeney, Melanie Bottoms, Sian Ellis, Gregor Ernst, Stefan Kimmel, Stefania Loutseti, Agnes Schimera, Leticia Scopel Camargo Carniel, Amanda Sharples, Frank Staab and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christopher J SweeneySyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3170-8728
Melanie BottomsSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
Sian EllisCorteva Agriscience, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Gregor ErnstBayer, CropScience Division, Monheim, Germany.
Stefan KimmelCorteva Agriscience, Munich, Germany.
Stefania LoutsetiSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
Agnes SchimeraADAMA Deutschland, Cologne, Germany.
Leticia Scopel Camargo CarnielBASF, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amanda SharplesFMC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Frank StaabBASF, Limburgerhof, Germany.
Michael T MarxBayer, CropScience Division, Monheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) perform key soil ecosystem services and, because of their symbiotic relationship with plant roots, may be exposed to the plant protection products (PPPs) applied to soils and crops. In 2017, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) released a scientific opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of PPPs for in-soil organisms, recommending the inclusion of AMF ecotoxicological testing in the PPP regulatory process. However, it is not clear how this can be implemented in a tiered, robust, and ecologically relevant manner. Through a critical review of current literature, we examine the recommendations made within the EFSA report and the methodologies available to integrate AMF into the PPP risk assessment and provide perspective and commentary on their agronomic and ecological relevance. We conclude that considerable research questions remain to be addressed prior to the inclusion of AMF into the in-soil organism risk assessment, many of which stem from the unique challenges associated with including an obligate symbiont within the PPP risk assessment. Finally, we highlight critical knowledge gaps and the further research required to enable development of relevant, reliable, and robust scientific tests alongside pragmatic and scientifically sound guidance to ensure that any future risk-assessment paradigm is adequately protective of the ecosystem services it aims to preserve. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1808-1823. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaMycorrhizaeEcosystemFungiPlant RootsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiEcological risk assessmentPesticidesSoil ecotoxicology

Identifiers

PMID35678214
PMCPMC9543394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.