Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35678029›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2023

Positron emission tomography-imaging assessment for guiding strategy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma receiving CAR T cells.

Jean Galtier, Laetitia Vercellino, Loic Chartier, Pierre Olivier, Claire Tabouret-Viaud, Charles Mesguich, Roberta Di Blasi, Amandine Durand, Léo Raffy, François-Xavier Gros and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The prognostic utility ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Standardized FDG-PET interpretation during CAR T-cell therapy in R/R DLBCL: a DESCAR-T study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Imaging the efficacy and side effects of CAR T-cell therapy in children and young adults.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jean GaltierUniversité de Paris, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hemato-oncologie, Paris.
Laetitia VercellinoAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hopital Saint-Louis, Medecine Nucléaire, Paris.
Loic ChartierLYSARC, Statistique, Pierre-Benite.
Pierre OlivierMedecine Nucleaire Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nancy.
Claire Tabouret-ViaudMedecine Nucleaire Centre Leclerc, Dijon.
Charles MesguichMedecine nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux.
Roberta Di BlasiAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hemato-oncologie, Paris.
Amandine DurandService d'Hématologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, INSERM UMR1231, Dijon.
Léo RaffyMedecine nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux.
François-Xavier GrosService d'hématologie clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux.
Isabelle MadelaineAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Pharmacie, Paris.
Veronique MeigninAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, service de pathologie.
Miryam MebarkiAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Louis Hospital, Therapie cellulaire, Paris.
Marie-Thérèse RubioHématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy.
Pierre FeugierHématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy.
Olivier CasasnovasService d'Hématologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, INSERM UMR1231, Dijon.
Michel MeignanLYSA-IM, Hopital Henri Mondor, Créteil.
Catherine ThieblemontUniversité de Paris, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Hemato-oncologie, Paris. catherine.thieblemont@aphp.fr.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon Bourgogne · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRCentre Georges François Leclerc · FRThe Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography response at 1 month (M1) and 3 months (M3) after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in a multicenter cohort of 160 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas (R/R LBCL). In total, 119 (75%) patients reached M1 evaluation; 64 (53%, 64/119) had a complete response (CR); 91% were Deauville Score (DS) 1-3. Progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly worse in patients with DS-5 at M1, than in patients with DS 1-3 (PFS hazard ratio [HR]=6.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.5-11.5 vs. OS HR=3.79, 95% CI: 1.7-8.5) and DS-4 (PFS HR=11.99, 95% CI: 5.0-28.9 vs. OS HR=12.49, 95% CI: 2.8-55.8). The 1-year PFS rates were 78.9% (95% CI: 58.9-89.9) for DS-4 at M1, similar to 67.3% (95% CI: 51.8-78.8) for patients with DS 1-3 at M1, very different to 8.6% (95% CI: 1.8-22.4) for DS-5, respectively. Only eight of 30 (26%) patients with DS-4 progressed. Response at M3 evaluated in 90 (57%) patients was prognostic for PFS with lower discrimination (HR=3.28, 95% CI: 1.5-7.0; P=0.003) but did not predict OS (HR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.2-2.3; P=0.45). Patients with a high baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) >80 mL had worse PFS (HR=2.05, 95% CI: 1.2-3.5; P=0.009) and OS (HR=4.52, 95% CI: 2.5-8.1; P<0.001) than patients with low TMTV. Multivariable analyses identified baseline elevated lactate dehydrogenase, DS-5, CAR T cells at M1 for PFS and baseline elevated lactate dehydrogenase, TMTV >80 mL, and DS-5 at M1 for OS. In conclusion, baseline TMTV and response at M1 strongly predicts outcomes of patients with R/R LBCL undergoing CAR T-cell therapy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffusePositron-Emission TomographyHumansLactate DehydrogenasesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesT-LymphocytesLactate Dehydrogenases

Identifiers

PMID35678029
PMCPMC9827160
OpenAlexW4282927156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.