ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2022
Variation in adhesion of
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05764187 (Incidence of White Spot Lesions Around Ceramic Brackets Compared With Metal Brackets Evaluated With Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Incidence of White Spot Lesions Around Ceramic Brackets Compared With Metal Brackets Evaluated With Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Disinfection Efficacy of Er-YAG Laser Light on Single-Species Candida Biofilms: Systematic Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- The effect of dental material type and masticatory forces on periodontitis-derived subgingival microbiomes.Biofilm · 2024Article
- Managing oral biofilms to avoid enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate differences in the adhesion levels of the most common oral pathogens, Methods: The samples were classified into three groups of bracket materials: 1) monocrystalline alumina ceramic (CR), 2) stainless steel metal (SS), and 3) polycarbonate plastic (PL), and a hydroxyapatite (HA) group was used to mimic the enamel surface. Saliva was collected from a healthy donor, and saliva-derived biofilms were grown on each sample. A real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to quantitatively evaluate differences in the attachment levels of total bacteria, Results: Adhesion of Conclusions: The higher adhesion of oral pathogens, such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.