Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35678001›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi2022

Lung Cancer Screening With Low-dose Chest Computed Tomography: Experience From Radon-contaminated Regions in Kazakhstan.

Alexandra Panina, Dilyara Kaidarova, Zhamilya Zholdybay, Akmaral Ainakulova, Jandos Amankulov, Dias Toleshbayev, Zhanar Zhakenova, Arman Khozhayev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. First Central Asian Forum on Lung Cancer.JTO clinical and research reports · 2026
    Article
  8. Screening Criteria Evaluation for Expansion in Pulmonary Neoplasias (SCREEN) II.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra PaninaKazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Dilyara KaidarovaKazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Zhamilya ZholdybayAsfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Akmaral AinakulovaKazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Jandos AmankulovKazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Dias ToleshbayevKazakh Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Zhanar ZhakenovaAsfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Arman KhozhayevAsfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Kazakh National Medical University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to present the baseline results of a pilot project conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of lung cancer screening using low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) in regions with excessive radon levels in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

methodsIn total, 3671 participants were screened by low-dose chest CT. Current, former, and never-smokers who resided in regions with elevated levels of radon in drinking water sources and indoor air, aged between 40 and 75 with no history of any cancer, and weighing less than 140 kg were included in the study. All lung nodules were categorized according to the American College of Radiology Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS 1.0).

resultsOverall, 614 (16.7%) participants had positive baseline CT findings (Lung-RADS categories 3 and 4). Seventy-four cancers were detected, yielding an overall cancer detection rate of 2.0%, with 10.8% (8/74) stage I and a predominance of stage III (59.4%; 44/74). Women never-smokers and men current smokers had the highest cancer detection rates, at 2.9% (12/412) and 6.1% (12/196), respectively. Compared to never-smokers, higher odds ratios (ORs) of lung cancer detection were found in smokers (OR,2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 4.05, p<0.001) and former smokers (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.06 to 5.06, p=0.003). The most common histologic type of cancer was adenocarcinoma (58.1%).

conclusionsImplementation of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in regions with elevated radon levels is an effective method for both smokers and never-smokers.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsRadonAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansKazakhstanMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSmokingTomography, X-Ray ComputedRadonKazakhstanLung neoplasmsMass screeningRadon

Identifiers

PMID35678001
PMCPMC9201089
OpenAlexW4223975559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.