Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677975›Full record

ReviewJournal of stroke2022

Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy.

Sigfus Kristinsson, Dirk B den Ouden, Chris Rorden, Roger Newman-Norlund, Jean Neils-Strunjas, Julius Fridriksson

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. White Matter Hyperintensities as a Predictor of Aphasia Recovery.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Narrative Discourse Predictors of Response to Naming Intervention in Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  10. Acute-Phase Machine Learning Prediction of 12-Month Aphasia and Discourse Recovery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cognitive Functions Supporting Learning Over Time in Naming Treatment for Aphasia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sigfus KristinssonCenter for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Dirk B den OudenCenter for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Chris RordenCenter for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Roger Newman-NorlundCenter for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Jean Neils-StrunjasDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Julius FridrikssonCenter for the Study of Aphasia Recovery, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic aphasia, a devastating impairment of language, affects up to a third of stroke survivors. Speech and language therapy has consistently been shown to improve language function in prior clinical trials, but few clinicially applicable predictors of individual therapy response have been identified to date. Consequently, clinicians struggle substantially with prognostication in the clinical management of aphasia. A rising prevalence of aphasia, in particular in younger populations, has emphasized the increasing demand for a personalized approach to aphasia therapy, that is, therapy aimed at maximizing language recovery of each individual with reference to evidence-based clinical recommendations. In this narrative review, we discuss the current state of the literature with respect to commonly studied predictors of therapy response in aphasia. In particular, we focus our discussion on biographical, neuropsychological, and neurobiological predictors, and emphasize limitations of the literature, summarize consistent findings, and consider how the research field can better support the development of personalized aphasia therapy. In conclusion, a review of the literature indicates that future research efforts should aim to recruit larger samples of people with aphasia, including by establishing multisite aphasia research centers.

Indexed as

AphasiaLanguage therapyStroke

Identifiers

PMID35677975
PMCPMC9194549
OpenAlexW4281834133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.