Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677830›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2022

Small Airways: The "Silent Zone" of 2021 GINA Report?

Marcello Cottini, Carlo Lombardi, Giovanni Passalacqua, Diego Bagnasco, Alvise Berti, Pasquale Comberiati, Gianluca Imeri, Massimo Landi, Enrico Heffler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06509659 (Methacholine Challenge Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06509659 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Methacholine Challenge Test (MCT) in Healthy Adults: Oscillometry Measured Alone Compared to Oscillometry and FEV1 During the Same Test

TypeobservationalSponsorAllergi- og Lungeklinikken, ElsinoreRan2024 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsHyperreactive Airway DiseaseArmsMethacholine Challenge Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Phenotyping treatment-naive uncontrolled asthma in adults: A primary care framework.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Marcello CottiniAllergy and Pneumology Outpatient Clinic, Bergamo, Italy.
Carlo LombardiDepartmental Unit of Allergology, Immunology & Pulmonary Diseases, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Giovanni PassalacquaAllergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
Diego BagnascoAllergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
Alvise BertiOspedale Santa Chiara and Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology (CIBIO), Thoracic Disease Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Pasquale ComberiatiSection of Pediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gianluca ImeriRespiratory Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, University of Milan-Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Massimo LandiInstitute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Enrico HefflerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero · ITInstitute for Biomedical Research and Innovation · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale Santa Chiara · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic disease, affecting approximately 350 million people worldwide. Inflammation and remodeling in asthma involve the large airways, and it is now widely accepted that the small airways (those with an internal diameter <2 mm) are involved in the pathogenesis of asthma and are the major determinant of airflow obstruction in this disease. From a clinical perspective, small airways dysfunction (SAD) is associated with more severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness, worse asthma control and more exacerbations. Unlike the GOLD guidelines which, in their definition, identify COPD as a disease of the small airways, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines do not refer to the prevalence and role of SAD in asthmatic patients. This decision seems surprising, given the growing body of compelling evidence accumulating pointing out the high prevalence of SAD in asthmatic patients and the importance of SAD in poor asthma control. Furthermore, and remarkably, SAD appears to possess the characteristics of a treatable pulmonary trait, making it certainly appealing for asthma control optimization and exacerbation rate reduction. In this mini-review article, we address the most recent evidence on the role of SAD on asthma control and critically review the possible inclusion of SAD among treatable pulmonary traits in international guidelines on asthma.

Indexed as

asthma controlbronchial asthmaGINA reportrecommendationssmall airways dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID35677830
PMCPMC9168121
OpenAlexW4281298081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.