Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677811›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2022

Design considerations for advancing data storage with synthetic DNA for long-term archiving.

Chisom Ezekannagha, Anke Becker, Dominik Heider, Georges Hattab

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimizing fountain codes for DNA data storage.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. DNAsmart: Multiple attribute ranking tool for DNA data storage systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chisom EzekannaghaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Str. 6, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.
Anke BeckerCenter for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 14, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.
Dominik HeiderDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Str. 6, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.
Georges HattabDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Str. 6, D-35043, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is increasingly emerging as a serious medium for long-term archival data storage because of its remarkable high-capacity, high-storage-density characteristics and its lasting ability to store data for thousands of years. Various encoding algorithms are generally required to store digital information in DNA and to maintain data integrity. Indeed, since DNA is the information carrier, its performance under different processing and storage conditions significantly impacts the capabilities of the data storage system. Therefore, the design of a DNA storage system must meet specific design considerations to be less error-prone, robust and reliable. In this work, we summarize the general processes and technologies employed when using synthetic DNA as a storage medium. We also share the design considerations for sustainable engineering to include viability. We expect this work to provide insight into how sustainable design can be used to develop an efficient and robust synthetic DNA-based storage system for long-term archiving.

Indexed as

DataData storageDesign considerationsEncodingSynthetic DNA

Identifiers

PMID35677811
PMCPMC9167972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.