Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

A Multicenter Cohort Study on the Adverse Effects Evaluation After Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccination Among Pregnant Healthcare Employees in Penang General Hospitals.

Ann Lisa Arulappen, Monica Danial, Gaiyathri Shanmugam, Joo Thye Cheng, Mairin Dulasi, Ting Soo Chow

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Knowledge, acceptance and concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women on the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia: A cross-sectional study.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann Lisa ArulappenDepartment of Pharmacy, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Ministry of Health, Permatang Pauh, Malaysia.
Monica DanialClinical Research Center, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Ministry of Health, Permatang Pauh, Malaysia.
Gaiyathri ShanmugamDepartment of Pharmacy, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Ministry of Health, Permatang Pauh, Malaysia.
Joo Thye ChengDepartment of Medicine, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Ministry of Health, Permatang Pauh, Malaysia.
Mairin DulasiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Ministry of Health, Permatang Pauh, Malaysia.
Ting Soo ChowDepartment of Medicine, Penang Hospital, Ministry of Health, George Town, Malaysia.
Hospital Seberang Jaya · MYMinistry of Health · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The year 2020 saw the emergence of novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which became a great threat to public health worldwide. The exponential spread of the disease with millions of lives lost worldwide saw the emergence of an accelerated vaccine development with emergency approval from well-known regulatory bodies such as the US Food and Drug Administration, followed by widespread vaccine deployment despite a paucity in safety profile data. This issue becomes even more pronounced when it involves expectant mothers considering the possible undesirable effect toward the unborn child. Method: This was a retrospective cohort study which was conducted at six general hospitals in the state of Penang, Malaysia. All the pregnant employees who have consented to take the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and participate in this study were monitored from the time of their first vaccination and up to 28 days after they delivered their babies. Results: All the participants had adequate maximum vertical pocket (MVP) and no obvious anomalies or detection of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) were detected during the second trimester. However, one subject was reported to have miscarried during the second trimester. The reported mean neonate birth weight was 3.0 kg with the mean Apgar score of 8.8 and 9.8 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Approximately seven (5.8%) neonates were reported to be small for their gestational age. Another three (2.5%) neonates were reported to have anomalies. Conclusion: As a whole, the inference that can be made from this study is that mRNA COVID-19 vaccine appears to be safe in pregnant women regardless of the trimester as the findings did not show obvious safety warning signs.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth PersonnelPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnant PeopleCohort StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansMalaysiamRNA VaccinesPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA Vaccinesadverse effects post vaccinationCOVID-19 vaccinemRNA vaccineneonatal outcomespregnancy outcomesafety of mRNA vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35677772
PMCPMC9168536
OpenAlexW4281286060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.