Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677658›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Characterization of the Interaction Between SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Protein (M) and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) as a Potential Therapeutic Target.

Érika Pereira Zambalde, Isadora Carolina Betim Pavan, Mariana Camargo Silva Mancini, Matheus Brandemarte Severino, Orlando Bonito Scudero, Ana Paula Morelli, Mariene Ribeiro Amorim, Karina Bispo-Dos-Santos, Mariana Marcela Góis, Daniel A Toledo-Teixeira and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Structural proteins of human coronaviruses: what makes them different?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Zebrafish models of COVID-19.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Érika Pereira ZambaldeMultidisciplinary Laboratory of Food and Health, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Limeira, Brazil.
Isadora Carolina Betim PavanLaboratory of Signaling Mechanisms, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas, (Unicamp), Campinas, Brazil.
Mariana Camargo Silva ManciniMultidisciplinary Laboratory of Food and Health, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Limeira, Brazil.
Matheus Brandemarte SeverinoMultidisciplinary Laboratory of Food and Health, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Limeira, Brazil.
Orlando Bonito ScuderoDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Paula MorelliMultidisciplinary Laboratory of Food and Health, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Limeira, Brazil.
Mariene Ribeiro AmorimLaboratory of Emerging Viruses (LEVE), Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Karina Bispo-Dos-SantosLaboratory of Emerging Viruses (LEVE), Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Mariana Marcela GóisMultidisciplinary Laboratory of Food and Health, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Limeira, Brazil.
Daniel A Toledo-TeixeiraLaboratory of Emerging Viruses (LEVE), Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Pierina Lorencini PariseLaboratory of Emerging Viruses (LEVE), Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Thais MauadSão Paulo University Medical School, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Marisa DolhnikoffSão Paulo University Medical School, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Hilário Nascimento SaldivaSão Paulo University Medical School, Department of Pathology, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Henrique Marques-SouzaInstitute of Biology, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
José Luiz Proenca-ModenaLaboratory of Emerging Viruses (LEVE), Department of Genetics, Evolution, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Armando Morais VenturaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Moreira SimabucoMultidisciplinary Laboratory of Food and Health, School of Applied Sciences, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Limeira, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 is an emerging virus from the Coronaviridae family and is responsible for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In this work, we explored the previously reported SARS-CoV-2 structural membrane protein (M) interaction with human Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA). The M protein is responsible for maintaining virion shape, and PCNA is a marker of DNA damage which is essential for DNA replication and repair. We validated the M-PCNA interaction through immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence co-localization, and PLA (Proximity Ligation Assay). In cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 or transfected with M protein, using immunofluorescence and cell fractioning, we documented a reallocation of PCNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and the increase of PCNA and γH2AX (another DNA damage marker) expression. We also observed an increase in PCNA and γH2AX expression in the lung of a COVID-19 patient by immunohistochemistry. In addition, the inhibition of PCNA translocation by PCNA I1 and Verdinexor led to a reduction of plaque formation in an

Indexed as

Coronavirus M ProteinsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenHumansSARS-CoV-2Coronavirus M Proteinsmembrane protein, SARS-CoV-2PCNA protein, humanProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenDNA damageM proteinPCNASARS-CoV-2viral-host interaction

Identifiers

PMID35677658
PMCPMC9168989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.