ArticleJournal of tropical medicine2022
Comparative Metabolic Characterization of Extraintestinal Pathogenic
Article in Journal of tropical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and genetic characterization of clinically relevant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producingFrontiers in antibiotics · 2023Review
- Epidemiological and genomic characteristics of globalFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of bloodstream infections caused by extraintestinal pathogenic Methods: The metabolic profiles of thirty E. Results: Our data found that non-BL/ESBL producers were of low metabolic capacity compared with ESBL-positive isolates although the difference remained insignificant. Higher levels of utilization for some carbohydrates, such as fructose and trehalose, were detected among ST131 isolates when compared with non-ST131, and ST131 was also significantly associated with metabolizing rhamnose. The mean bio-score of both isolate groups was insignificant. We showed no link between metabolism and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles among tested blood isolates. Conclusion: ST131 blood isolates were slightly higher in their carbohydrate utilization activity than non-ST131. More importantly, ST131 isolates were significantly capable of metabolizing rhamnose. Future research should focus on the factors that might drive the success of major ExPEC clones such as ST131.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.