Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677492›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2021

Development of a local model for measuring the work of surgeons.

Sara Forootan, Sakineh Hajebrahimi, Ali Janati, Behzad Najafi, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara ForootanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz, Iran.
Sakineh HajebrahimiResearch Center for Evidence Based Medicine (RCEBM), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz, Iran.
Ali JanatiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz, Iran.
Behzad NajafiDepartment of Health Economics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Asghari-JafarabadiCenter for the Development of Interdisciplinary Research in Islamic Sciences and Health Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The Relative Value Unit (RVU) is the main method of calculating surgeons' reimbursements and a tool for measuring the work of surgeons. Existing evidence shows that the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) does not accurately represent surgeon's work. Therefore, the current study attempted to develop a local model to measure surgeons' work. Material and Methods: This study was conducted in two main phases of determining the metrics and model development using quantitative and qualitative approaches from December 2019 to April 2021. Literature review, focused group discussions, and interviews were used to collect data. Con- tent analysis and Exploratory Data Analysis techniques were applied to analyze data. Results: The findings demonstrated that patient's conditions (age, severity of disease at referring time, and comorbidities), disease specifications (time, complexity, physical effort, and risk), and provider characteristic (surgeon's willingness, imposed stress, and surgeon's skill) were important by 17, 51, and 32%, respectively, in determining surgeons' work. Conclusion: Determining a fixed value for each procedure does not accurately estimate the amount of required surgeon's work for any procedure. Many factors, such as the patient's condition, surgeon's characteristics, and disease specification affect surgeons' work in the operation room. Proper measurement of the surgeon's work is an important step towards establishing equity in payment in the health system.

Indexed as

measurementRelative value unitsurgeon’s workwork relative value unit

Identifiers

PMID35677492
PMCPMC9130942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.