ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2022
Prospective comparison of single encounter versus distributed laparoscopic training in novice learners: A controlled trial.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distributed training vs. massed practice for surgical skills training-a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of Pakistani Healthcare Simulation: Insights for Lower-Middle-Income Countries.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe traditional model of teaching surgical skills on "real" patients using graded responsibility is being seriously questioned, and there is a paradigm shift toward exploiting simulators. There is a lack of clarity on the impact of using simulation as a teaching strategy in novice learners. The purpose of our study was to determine if the number and duration of training sessions influence the acquisition and retention of laparoscopic skills in naïve learners. There are some data to suggest that distributed training programs might have better outcomes, but the results are inconclusive. We designed a controlled trial at Aga Khan University, Karachi, with the hypothesis that students trained using the distributed method may have enhanced learning outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methods100 medical students were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups. Group A underwent a single orientation and supervised practice session of 3 h duration. Group B underwent distributed teaching with three learning sessions of 1 h each spread over 3 consecutive weeks. Participant scores were analyzed before and after the intervention and at 3- and 6-month intervals using repeat measures of ANOVA.
resultsPretest and immediate posttest scores were comparable between the two groups. The 3-month interval test showed significantly higher scores in Group B (difference = -2.90,
conclusionsDistributed teaching resulted in significantly enhanced scores at 3-month assessment. However, similar scores at 6 months suggest the need for repeated intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.