Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677253›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2022

Perception of e-learning in medical students and faculty during COVID time: A study based on a questionnaire-based survey.

Sandip Meghnad Hulke, Santosh L Wakode, Avinash E Thakare, Rachna Parashar, Rajay N Bharshnakar, Ankur Joshi, Yuganti P Vaidya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandip Meghnad HulkeDepartment of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Santosh L WakodeDepartment of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Avinash E ThakareDepartment of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rachna ParasharDepartment of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rajay N BharshnakarDepartment of Physiology, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ankur JoshiDepartment of CFM, AIIMS, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Yuganti P VaidyaDepartment of Anatomy, Peoples Medical College and RC, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · INGandhi Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the emergence of COVID, we are forced to use e-learning in form of arranging online classes for students. Medical educators all over the world are conducting online classes for students. This study aimed to evaluate the perception of online learning among MBBS students and teachers through a questionnaire-based survey. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was done in the AIIMS, Bhopal. The study was based on questionnaire (online Google form) response received from 43 number of faculty and 156 number of students. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi-square test and unpaired

resultsHandling software, technical issues, and lack of face-to-face interaction were more significant problems in students compared to faculty. The desire for the social site which causes disturbances in learning was a significant problem in the students compared to faculty. Giving and taking assessment problem was reported by 60% and 63.8% of faculty and students, respectively (

conclusionsStudents, as well as faculty, have mixed reactions toward e-learning. Most importantly affected in the present scenario is practical/clinical teaching and assessment. Every attempt needs to be done to strengthen infrastructure and impart training to students and faculty.

Indexed as

COVIDeLearningGoogle Classroommedical educationperceptionteacher–student interaction

Identifiers

PMID35677253
PMCPMC9170216
OpenAlexW4285744249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.