Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677171›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Emerging Role of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Reirradiation of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancers: What Have We Achieved So Far?

Tapesh Bhattacharyya, Masashi Koto, Paul Windisch, Hiroaki Ikawa, Yasuhito Hagiwara, Hiroshi Tsuji, Sebastian Adeberg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integration of an electron beam ion trap source into an electrostatic accelerator for pre-clinical cancer research.Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment · 2025
    Article
  2. Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Tapesh BhattacharyyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata, India.
Masashi KotoQST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Paul WindischDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Hiroaki IkawaQST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Yasuhito HagiwaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Hiroshi TsujiQST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan.
Sebastian AdebergNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology · JPKantonsspital Winterthur · CHUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Administering reirradiation for the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancers is extremely challenging. These tumors are hypoxic and radioresistant and require escalated radiation doses for adequate control. The obstacle to delivering this escalated dose of radiation to the target is its proximity to critical organs at risk (OARs) and possible development of consequent severe late toxicities. With the emergence of highly sophisticated technologies, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy have shown promising outcomes. Proton beam radiotherapy has been used for locally recurrent head and neck cancers because of its excellent physical dose distribution, exploring sharp Bragg peak properties with negligible entrance and exit doses. To further improve these results, carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been explored in several countries across Europe and Asia because of its favorable physical properties with minimal entrance and exit doses, sharper lateral penumbra, and much higher and variable relative biological efficacy, which cannot be currently achieved with any other form of radiation. Few studies have described the role of CIRT in recurrent head and neck cancers. In this article, we have discussed the different aspects of carbon ions in reirradiation of recurrent head and neck cancers, including European and Asian experiences, different dose schedules, dose constraints of OARs, outcomes, and toxicities, and a brief comparison with proton beam radiotherapy and IMRT.

Indexed as

carbon ion therapyhadron therapy beamradioresistancerecurrent head and neck cancerreirradiation

Identifiers

PMID35677171
PMCPMC9167994
OpenAlexW4281288690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.