Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35677169›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Image-Based Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Jun Liu, Jing-Ning Huang, Ming-Han Wang, Zhen-Yang Ni, Wei-Hao Jiang, Manhon Chung, Cheng-Jiang Wei, Zhi-Chao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Clarification the terms and definitions related to neurofibromatosis type 1].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun LiuSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jing-Ning HuangSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ming-Han WangSchool of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhen-Yang NiSchool of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei-Hao JiangSchool of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Manhon ChungDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng-Jiang WeiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Chao WangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a dominant hereditary disease characterized by the mutation of the

Indexed as

differential diagnosisfuture prospectivesmalignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST)medical radiology image methodsneurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)

Identifiers

PMID35677169
PMCPMC9168278
OpenAlexW4281290366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.