ArticleCureus2022
Non-technical Skills for Medical Students: Validating the Tools of the Trade.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The PAPER heuristic: a structured cognitive aid to reduce intrinsic cognitive load in early clinical reasoning training.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Collecting evidence of validity for an assessment tool for Norwegian medical students' non-technical skills (NorMS-NTS): usability and reliability when used by novice raters.BMC medical education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Medical Students' Non-Technical Skills (Medi-StuNTS) is a behavioural marker scheme (BMS) designed to assess non-technical skills (NTS) in medical students in emergency simulations. This study aimed to assess the evidence for validity and usability of Medi-StuNTS by naive, near-peer educators. Nine doctors assessed four students in simulations of common medical emergencies. The scores were used to assess inter-rater reliability, inter-class correlation, and observability. Students and assessors completed questionnaires that assessed the tool's usability and consequence. Inter-rater agreement across all skill elements was "high" with rWG scores >0.8. An inter-class correlation was "good" with ICC3K kappa scores of 0.86 and 0.89 overall, when measured per simulation and per skills element respectively. Overall skill observability was high (>80%) except for coping with stress. Assessors found the tool "difficult to use" but "useful for feeding back in a constructive way". Students appreciated the comprehensiveness of the feedback as well as knowing what to expect during debriefs. This study has shown that the Medi-StuNTS BMS has good usability and evidence of validity in naive assessors and near-peer educators. It shows the particularly good internal structure and overall beneficial consequences. Further study will be necessary to understand how best to deploy it in formative and summative contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.