Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676917›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2022

Usage of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator during pregnancy.

J-Jacqueline Olic, Claudia Stöllberger, Christoph Schukro, Katja E Odening, Edith Reuschel, Marcus Fischer, Christian Veltmann, David Duncker, Andrea Baessler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Risks Diagnosis and Management.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

J-Jacqueline OlicDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Claudia StöllbergerDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Rudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph SchukroDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katja E OdeningTranslational Cardiology, Department of Cardiology and Institute of Physiology, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Edith ReuschelUniversity Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology At The Hospital St. Hedwig of The Order of St. John, University of Regensburg, 93049 Regensburg, Germany.
Marcus FischerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian VeltmannHannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
David DunckerHannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Andrea BaesslerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATRudolfinerhaus Hospital · ATUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy can trigger or aggravate the risk for life-threating arrhythmias in cardiac diseases. Pregnancy is associated with reluctance for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) due to concerns about radiation. Thus, the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) might be an option during pregnancy. Aim of the study was to collect experiences about the use of WCD in pregnancy. Methods and results: This study retrospectively included eight women who received a WCD during pregnancy. They suffered from ventricular tachycardia (VT) without known cardiac disease (n = 3), Brugada syndrome (n = 1), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 1), non-compaction (n = 1), and survived sudden cardiac arrest during a preceding pregnancy (n = 1). WCD usage was started between 13 and 28 weeks of gestation. WCD wearing period ranged from 3 days to 30.9 weeks, WCD wearing time ranged from 13.0 to 23.7 h per day. Two women (25%) abandoned WCD already during pregnancy. Neither appropriate nor inappropriate WCD shocks were recorded. Antiarrhythmic management included beta-blockers (n = 5) and flecainide (n = 2). After delivery, ICD were implanted (n = 4), refused (n = 2) and estimated not necessary after successful catheter ablation (n = 2). Conclusion: Uneventful pregnancy is possible in women at risk for sudden cardiac death by interdisciplinary monitoring and diligent pharmacotherapy protected by the WCD. Since no WCD shocks were recorded, the effectiveness of WCD during pregnancy is still unclear. However, arrhythmia detection by WCD was very good despite the changed anatomy in pregnancy. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to assess effectiveness of WCD in pregnant women. Furthermore, efforts should be made to increase the wearing adherence of WCD during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias during pregnancyCardiomyopathyPregnancySudden cardiac deathVentricular arrhythmiasWearable cardioverter-defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID35676917
PMCPMC9168609
OpenAlexW4281717319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.