ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2022
Eye-opening in brain death: A case report and review of the literature.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spinal reflexes and brain death.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: According to Italian law, brain death is diagnosed when the patient is in a coma, showing the absence of respiratory drive under specific clinical conditions, and without any brain stem reflexes. On the other hand, presence of spinal reflexes, when correctly identified, does not hamper the diagnosis. Case report: We present a case of eyelid elevation two seconds after thoracic pain stimulation in a patient who otherwise fulfilled all clinical and instrumental brain-death criteria due to a residual preserved function of the superior cervical ganglion. Conclusion: Although the observed reflex is to be considered extracerebral, and therefore it should not hamper the diagnosis of BD, the authors propose implementing cerebral flow evaluation, considered "prudential", as a preliminary assessment before determining BD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.