ArticleJournal of microscopy2022
A method for the fast and photon-efficient analysis of time-domain fluorescence lifetime image data over large dynamic ranges.
Article in Journal of microscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluorescence Lifetime Microscopy Methods for Studying Dynamics of Fluorescent Proteins In Vivo and In Vitro.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Widefield frequency-domain autofluorescence lifetime imaging for detecting breast cancer in murine xenograft tumor tissues.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Single-sample image-fusion upsampling of fluorescence lifetime images.Science advances · 2024Article
- Fluorescence Lifetime Measurements and Analyses: Protocols Using Flow Cytometry and High-Throughput Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- A method for the fast and photon-efficient analysis of time-domain fluorescence lifetime image data over large dynamic ranges.Journal of microscopy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) allows the quantification of sub-cellular processes in situ, in living cells. A number of approaches have been developed to extract the lifetime from time-domain FLIM data, but they are often limited in terms of speed, photon efficiency, precision or the dynamic range of lifetimes they can measure. Here, we focus on one of the best performing methods in the field, the centre-of-mass method (CMM), that conveys advantages in terms of speed and photon efficiency over others. In this paper, however, we identify a loss of photon efficiency of CMM for short lifetimes when background noise is present. We subsequently present a new development and generalization of CMM that provides for the rapid and accurate extraction of fluorescence lifetime over a large lifetime dynamic range. We provide software tools to simulate, validate and analyse FLIM data sets and compare the performance of our approach against the standard CMM and the commonly employed least-square minimization (LSM) methods. Our method features a better photon efficiency than standard CMM and LSM and is robust in the presence of background noise. The algorithm is applicable to any time-domain FLIM data set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.