Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676668›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

COVID-19 - an opportunity to improve access to primary care through organizational innovations? A qualitative multiple case study in Quebec and Nova Scotia (Canada).

Mylaine Breton, Emily Gard Marshall, Véronique Deslauriers, Mélanie Ann Smithman, Lauren R Moritz, Richard Buote, Bobbi Morrison, Erin K Christian, Madeleine McKay, Katherine Stringer and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Mylaine BretonUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. mylaine.breton@usherbrooke.ca.
Emily Gard MarshallDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Véronique DeslauriersUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Mélanie Ann SmithmanUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Lauren R MoritzDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Richard BuoteDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Bobbi MorrisonSt. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada.
Erin K ChristianNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
Madeleine McKayDoctors Nova Scotia, Dartmouth, Canada.
Katherine StringerDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Claire Godard-SebillotteMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Nadia SourialUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Maude LabergeUniversité Laval, Québec, Canada.
Adrian MacKenzieNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
Jennifer E IsenorDalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Arnaud DuhouxUniversité de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Rachelle AshcroftUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Maria MathewsWestern University, London, Canada.
Benoit CossetteUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Catherine HudonUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Beth McDougallNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada.
Line GuénetteUniversité Laval, Québec, Canada.
Rhonda KirkwoodCollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia, Bedford, Canada.
Michael E GreenQueen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité Laval · CACollege of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario · CAMcGill University · CANova Scotia Hospital · CAQueen's University · CASt. Francis Xavier University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR #447605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 catalyzed a rapid and substantial reorganization of primary care, accelerating the spread of existing strategies and fostering a proliferation of innovations. Access to primary care is an essential component of a healthcare system, particularly during a pandemic. We describe organizational innovations aiming to improve access to primary care and related contextual changes during the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in two Canadian provinces, Quebec and Nova Scotia.

methodsWe conducted a multiple case study based on 63 semi-structured interviews (n = 33 in Quebec, n = 30 in Nova Scotia) conducted between October 2020 and May 2021 and 71 documents from both jurisdictions. We recruited a diverse range of provincial and regional stakeholders (e.g., policy-makers, decision-makers, family physicians, nurses) involved in reorganizing primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic using purposeful sampling (e.g., based on role, region). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was conducted in NVivo12. Emerging results were discussed by team members to identify salient themes and organized into logic models.

resultsWe identified and analyzed six organizational innovations. Four of these - centralized public online booking systems, centralized access centers for unattached patients, interim primary care clinics for unattached patients, and a community connector to health and social services for older adults - pre-dated COVID-19 but were accelerated by the pandemic context. The remaining two innovations were created to specifically address pandemic-related needs: COVID-19 hotlines and COVID-dedicated primary healthcare clinics. Innovation spread and proliferation was influenced by several factors, such as a strengthened sense of community amongst providers, decreased patient demand at the beginning of the first wave, renewed policy and provider interest in population-wide access (versus attachment of patients only), suspended performance targets (e.g., continuity ≥80%) in Quebec, modality of care delivery, modified fee codes, and greater regional flexibility to implement tailored innovations.

conclusionCOVID-19 accelerated the uptake and creation of organizational innovations to potentially improve access to primary healthcare, removing, at least temporarily, certain longstanding barriers. Many stakeholders believed this reorganization would have positive impacts on access to primary care after the pandemic. Further studies should analyze the effectiveness and sustainability of innovations adapted, developed, and implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedCanadaHumansNova ScotiaOrganizational InnovationPandemicsPrimary Health CareQuebecAccessCOVID-19Healthcare policyLogic modelsOrganizational innovationPrimary careQualitative case study

Identifiers

PMID35676668
PMCPMC9177136
OpenAlexW4281712886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.