Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676541›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2022

Natural language signatures of psilocybin microdosing.

Camila Sanz, Federico Cavanna, Stephanie Muller, Laura de la Fuente, Federico Zamberlan, Matías Palmucci, Lucie Janeckova, Martin Kuchar, Facundo Carrillo, Adolfo M García and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psilocybin-assisted neurofeedback for the improvement of executive functions: a randomized semi-naturalistic-lab feasibility study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Psilocybin: From Psychiatric Pariah to Perceived Panacea.The American journal of psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Is microdosing a placebo? A rapid review of low-dose LSD and psilocybin research.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Camila SanzDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. camilasanz@gmail.com.
Federico CavannaDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Stephanie MullerDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura de la FuenteDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Federico ZamberlanDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Matías PalmucciDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lucie JaneckovaForensic Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin KucharForensic Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Facundo CarrilloApplied Artificial Intelligence Lab (ICC-CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Adolfo M GarcíaCognitive Neuroscience Center (1644), Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carla PallaviciniDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Enzo TagliazucchiDepartamento de Física, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires (IFIBA - CONICET), Pabellón I, Ciudad Universitaria (1428), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. tagliazucchi.enzo@googlemail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-9993
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational Institute of Mental Health · CZUniversidad de Santiago de Chile · CLUniversity of Chemistry and Technology, Prague · CZ

Funding

Alzheimer's Association UK-22-865742Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1210176Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica PICT-2019-02294Grantová Agentura České Republiky 20-25349SMinisterstvo Vnitra České Republiky NU21-04-00307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleSerotonergic psychedelics are being studied as novel treatments for mental health disorders and as facilitators of improved well-being, mental function, and creativity. Recent studies have found mixed results concerning the effects of low doses of psychedelics ("microdosing") on these domains. However, microdosing is generally investigated using instruments designed to assess larger doses of psychedelics, which might lack sensitivity and specificity for this purpose.

objectivesDetermine whether unconstrained speech contains signatures capable of identifying the acute effects of psilocybin microdoses.

methodsNatural speech under psilocybin microdoses (0.5 g of psilocybin mushrooms) was acquired from thirty-four healthy adult volunteers (11 females: 32.09 ± 3.53 years; 23 males: 30.87 ± 4.64 years) following a double-blind and placebo-controlled experimental design with two measurement weeks per participant. On Wednesdays and Fridays of each week, participants consumed either the active dose (psilocybin) or the placebo (edible mushrooms). Features of interest were defined based on variables known to be affected by higher doses: verbosity, semantic variability, and sentiment scores. Machine learning models were used to discriminate between conditions. Classifiers were trained and tested using stratified cross-validation to compute the AUC and p-values.

resultsExcept for semantic variability, these metrics presented significant differences between a typical active microdose and the inactive placebo condition. Machine learning classifiers were capable of distinguishing between conditions with high accuracy (AUC [Formula: see text] 0.8).

conclusionsThese results constitute first evidence that low doses of serotonergic psychedelics can be identified from unconstrained natural speech, with potential for widely applicable, affordable, and ecologically valid monitoring of microdosing schedules.

Indexed as

HallucinogensMental DisordersAdultCreativityDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLanguageMalePsilocybinHallucinogensPsilocybinLanguageMachine learningMicrodosingPsilocybinPsychedelics

Identifiers

PMID35676541
OpenAlexW4282945619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.