Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676399›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Assessment of liver cirrhosis severity with extracellular volume fraction MRI.

Narine Mesropyan, Patrick A Kupczyk, Leona Dold, Michael Praktiknjo, Johannes Chang, Alexander Isaak, Christoph Endler, Dmitrij Kravchenko, Leon M Bischoff, Alois M Sprinkart and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The relationship between myocardial and hepatic T1 relaxometry on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes late after tetralogy of Fallot repair.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of test-retest repeatability of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for TQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Narine Mesropyan *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Patrick A Kupczyk *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Leona DoldDepartment of Internal Medicine I and Center for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension Bonn (CCB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Michael PraktiknjoDepartment of Internal Medicine I and Center for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension Bonn (CCB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Johannes ChangDepartment of Internal Medicine I and Center for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension Bonn (CCB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander IsaakDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Christoph EndlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Dmitrij KravchenkoDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Leon M BischoffDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Alois M SprinkartDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Claus C PieperDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Daniel KuettingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Christian JansenDepartment of Internal Medicine I and Center for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension Bonn (CCB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Ulrike I AttenbergerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Julian A LuetkensDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Quantitative Imaging Lab Bonn (QILaB), University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. julian.luetkens@ukbonn.de.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of MRI extracellular volume fraction (ECV) for the assessment of liver cirrhosis severity as defined by Child-Pugh class. In this retrospective study, 90 patients (68 cirrhotic patients and 22 controls), who underwent multiparametric liver MRI, were identified. Hepatic T1 relaxation times and ECV were assessed. Clinical scores of liver disease severity were calculated. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for statistical analysis. In cirrhotic patients, hepatic native T1 increased depending on Child-Pugh class (620.5 ± 78.9 ms (Child A) vs. 666.6 ± 73.4 ms (Child B) vs. 828.4 ± 91.2 ms (Child C), P < 0.001). ECV was higher in cirrhotic patients compared to the controls (40.1 ± 11.9% vs. 25.9 ± 4.5%, P < 0.001) and increased depending of Child-Pugh class (33.3 ± 6.0% (Child A) vs. 39.6 ± 4.9% (Child B) vs. 52.8 ± 1.2% (Child C), P < 0.001). ECV correlated with Child-Pugh score (r = 0.64, P < 0.001). ECV allowed differentiating between Child-Pugh classes A and B, and B and C with an AUC of 0.785 and 0.944 (P < 0.001, respectively). The diagnostic performance of ECV for differentiating between Child-Pugh classes A and B, and B and C was higher compared to hepatic native T1 (AUC: 0.651 and 0.910) and MELD score (AUC: 0.740 and 0.795) (P < 0.05, respectively). MRI-derived ECV correlated with Child-Pugh score and had a high diagnostic performance for the discrimination of different Child-Pugh classes. ECV might become a valuable non-invasive biomarker for the assessment of liver cirrhosis severity.

Indexed as

Liver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansLiverRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35676399
PMCPMC9177655
OpenAlexW4281823523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.