Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676383›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2022

Feeding behavior of post-weaned crossbred steers supplemented in the dry season of the year.

Túlio Otávio Jardim D 'Almeida Lins, Robério Rodrigues Silva, Fabrício Bacelar Lima Mendes, Fabiano Ferreira da Silva, Everton Santos Bastos, Tarcísio Ribeiro Paixão, João Wilian Dias Silva, Marceliana da Conceição Santos, Gabriel Chaves Figueiredo, Henry Daniel Ruiz Alba and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Túlio Otávio Jardim D 'Almeida LinsDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Robério Rodrigues SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Fabrício Bacelar Lima MendesDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Fabiano Ferreira da SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Everton Santos BastosDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Tarcísio Ribeiro PaixãoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
João Wilian Dias SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Marceliana da Conceição SantosDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Gabriel Chaves FigueiredoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, Bahia, 45700-000, Brazil.
Henry Daniel Ruiz AlbaDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-110, Brazil.
Gleidson Giordano Pinto de CarvalhoDepartment of Animal Science, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-110, Brazil. gleidsongiordano@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-6782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feeding behavior of grazing steers supplemented in the dry season of the year. Thirty-two castrated crossbred (½ Holstein-Zebu) steers with an average initial weight of 378 ± 7.54 kg, aged 14 months, were distributed into four treatment groups in a completely randomized design with eight replicates. The animals were managed in an area covered with a pasture of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu, in a rotational grazing system. The supplement was formulated so that the animals in the different treatment groups would ingest the same amount of crude protein (CP) daily. Thus, the treatments consisted of increasing levels of supplementation, based on the animals' body weight (BW), as the protein content of the supplement was reduced. The following treatments (dry matter basis) were tested: T2, supplement at 0.2% BW, with 50% CP; T4, supplement at 0.4% BW, with 25% CP; T6, supplement at 0.6% BW, with 16.67% CP; and T8, supplement at 0.8% BW, with 12.5% CP. Forage dry matter intake decreased linearly (P < 0.05), characterizing a substitution effect. The increasing supplementation levels influenced the animals' feeding behavior, especially grazing time, total feeding time, number of grazing bouts, and number of bites per day, which showed a positive quadratic response (P < 0.05), and rumination time, number of rumination bouts, number of cuds ruminated per day, and number of chews per ruminated cud, which exhibited a negative quadratic behavior (P < 0.05). Dry matter and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) feed efficiencies and dry matter and NDF rumination efficiencies responded quadratically (P < 0.05). In conclusion, concentrate supplementation at up to 0.8% BW improves the feeding behavior of grazing steers in terms of the intake of concentrate supplement and forage as well as the feed and rumination efficiencies.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary FiberDietary SupplementsDigestionFeeding BehaviorSeasonsDietary FiberCrude proteinGrazingIntakeRuminantSupplement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.