Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676343›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Daily partner responsiveness and everyday sleep outcomes in breast cancer survivors and their partners.

Alyssa L Fenech, Christine Perndorfer, Emily C Soriano, Amy K Otto, Hannah A Brownlee, Michael Morreale, Scott D Siegel, Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alyssa L FenechDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716-2577, USA. afenech@udel.edu.
Christine PerndorferDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716-2577, USA.
Emily C SorianoDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716-2577, USA.
Amy K OttoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Hannah A BrownleeDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716-2577, USA.
Michael MorrealeDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716-2577, USA.
Scott D SiegelHelen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
Jean-Philippe LaurenceauDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, 108 Wolf Hall, Newark, DE, 19716-2577, USA. jlaurenc@udel.edu.
University of Delaware · USChristiana Care Health System · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Intensive Longitudinal Study of Fear of Recurrence in Cancer Patients and SpousesR21CA171921 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI LAURENCEAU, JEAN-PHILIPPE · 2013 to 2014
$381k
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute R21CA171921NCI NIH HHS R21 CA171921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer (BC) survivors and their intimate partners face several adverse consequences from the cancer experience, including sleep disturbance, which is a common side effect of BC and its treatment. Sleep has been conceptualized and examined as an individual phenomenon despite most adults sharing a bed/room with a partner. Limited research has examined the associations between daily relationship processes and sleep in couples coping with cancer. Using an intensive longitudinal design, the present study examined the daily, within-person links between attempted and perceived partner responsiveness and subjective sleep.

methodsImmediately following adjuvant treatment, 72 early-stage BC survivors and their intimate partners (144 paired individuals) reported on daily attempted and perceived partner responsiveness each evening and subjective sleep each morning for 21 consecutive days.

resultsSurvivor and partner reports of partner responsiveness were associated with their own subjective sleep, such that greater attempted and perceived partner responsiveness were associated with improvements in one's own subjective sleep. Effects of one participant's partner responsiveness on their partner's sleep were not observed.

conclusionsFindings suggest that among couples coping with early-stage BC, increased partner responsiveness is associated with subsequent improvements in subjective sleep. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Sleep disturbance is a serious concern for BC survivors and their intimate partners. Future research should assess intimacy processes as a potential method to improve BC survivor and partner sleep.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsSexual PartnersSleepBreast cancerIntimacySleepSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35676343
OpenAlexW4282939450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.