ArticleTranslational psychiatry2022
Integrative PheWAS analysis in risk categorization of major depressive disorder and identifying their associations with genetic variants using a latent topic model approach.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leveraging multigenerational health data to enhance mental disorder risk prediction: a population-based cohort study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Resolving heterogeneity in first-episode and drug-naive major depressive disorder based on individualized structural covariance network: evidence from the REST-meta-MDD consortium.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring beyond diagnoses in electronic health records to improve discovery: a review of the phenome-wide association study.JAMIA open · 2025Review
- Longitudinal early epigenomic signatures inform molecular paths of therapy response and remission in depressed patients.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Towards a multidimensional model of inflamed depression.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the most prevalent mental disorder that constitutes a major public health problem. A tool for predicting the risk of MDD could assist with the early identification of MDD patients and targeted interventions to reduce the risk. We aimed to derive a risk prediction tool that can categorize the risk of MDD as well as discover biologically meaningful genetic variants. Data analyzed were from the fourth and fifth data collections of a longitudinal community-based cohort from Southwest Montreal, Canada, between 2015 and 2018. To account for high dimensional features, we adopted a latent topic model approach to infer a set of topical distributions over those studied predictors that characterize the underlying meta-phenotypes of the MDD cohort. MDD probability derived from 30 MDD meta-phenotypes demonstrated superior prediction accuracy to differentiate MDD cases and controls. Six latent MDD meta-phenotypes we inferred via a latent topic model were highly interpretable. We then explored potential genetic variants that were statistically associated with these MDD meta-phenotypes. The genetic heritability of MDD meta-phenotypes was 0.126 (SE = 0.316), compared to 0.000001 (SE = 0.297) for MDD diagnosis defined by the structured interviews. We discovered a list of significant MDD - related genes and pathways that were missed by MDD diagnosis. Our risk prediction model confers not only accurate MDD risk categorization but also meaningful associations with genetic predispositions that are linked to MDD subtypes. Our findings shed light on future research focusing on these identified genes and pathways for MDD subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.