Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676021›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Endometrial factors in the implantation failure spectrum: protocol of a MUltidisciplinary observational cohort study in women with Repeated Implantation failure and recurrent Miscarriage (MURIM Study).

Linda Stevens Brentjens, Denise Habets, Janneke Den Hartog, Salwan Al-Nasiry, Lotte Wieten, Servaas Morré, Aafke Van Montfoort, Andrea Romano, Ron van Golde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda Stevens BrentjensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands linda.brentjens@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7650-8837
Denise HabetsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Janneke Den HartogDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Salwan Al-NasiryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lotte WietenGROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Servaas MorréGROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
Aafke Van MontfoortDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andrea RomanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ron van GoldeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM) are proposed to be at opposite ends of the implantation spectrum, with RM representing an overly receptive endometrium (implantation of genetically aberrant or poor-quality embryos) versus RIF representing an overly selective endometrium (no implantation even with good quality embryos). In both cases, often no explanation for reproductive failure can be found and although promising add-on treatments have been introduced, therapeutic options are frequently limited to supportive care. Both RM and RIF are multifactorial and research indicates that the interplay between steroidogenesis, uterine natural killer (uNK) cells and the microbiome determine the capacity of the endometrium to be a biosensor for invading embryos. Our objective is to elucidate whether there is a difference in endometrial receptivity parameters (ie, steroid metabolism, uNK cells and the microbiome) between women aged 18-38 years with reproductive failure (RIF and RM), and fertile controls. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Single-centre, observational cohort study. Endometrial biopsies, vaginal swabs and peripheral blood will be collected during the window of implantation and menstrual blood in the subsequent menstruation. The study parameters are the steroid profile (steroid levels and mRNA levels, protein expression and activity of steroid enzymes) in endometrial tissue and peripheral blood, as well as the activating or inhibitory phenotype of uNK cells based on receptor expression in menstrual blood and endometrial tissue and determination of the vaginal and endometrial microbiome using the inter spacer bacterial profiling technique. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the local medical ethical review committee at the Maastricht University Medical Centre. Findings from this study will be shared with the academic and medical community and the patient organisations to optimise and individualise medical care of patients with implantation failure and miscarriages. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR7571, registered 28 February 2019.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualInfertility, FemaleCohort StudiesEmbryo ImplantationEndometriumFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicProtocols & guidelinesReproductive medicineREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINESubfertility

Identifiers

PMID35676021
PMCPMC9185487
OpenAlexW4282946921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.