Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676003›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Stakeholders' perceptions of adolescents' sexual and reproductive health needs in Southeast Nigeria: a qualitative study.

Chinyere Cecilia Okeke, Chinyere Ojiugo Mbachu, Ifunanya Clara Agu, Uchenna Ezenwaka, Ifeyinwa Arize, Chibuike Agu, Chinonso Obayi, Obinna Onwujekwe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chinyere Cecilia OkekeDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-6213-4539
Chinyere Ojiugo MbachuDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ifunanya Clara AguHealth Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria ifunanya.agu.pg82641@unn.edu.ng.ORCID 0000-0001-9048-064X
Uchenna EzenwakaHealth Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ifeyinwa ArizeHealth Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
Chibuike AguHealth Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
Chinonso ObayiHealth Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
Obinna OnwujekweHealth Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria.
University of Nigeria · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explored the perceptions of adult stakeholders on adolescents sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs, variations of perceived needs by different social stratifiers and adolescent's perceived interventions to address these needs. This will provide evidence that could be useful for policy and programme reviews for improving access and use of services in to meet the SRH needs of adolescents.

designA qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted in Ebonyi state, Southeast, Nigeria. Data were analysed using thematic framework and content analysis approaches. SETTING AND

participantsThis qualitative study was conducted in six selected local government areas in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. The study participants comprised of adult stakeholders including community leaders, adolescent boys and girls aged 13-18 years. Adolescents were purposively selected from schools, skill acquisition centres and workplaces. A total of 77 in-depth interviews, 6 (with community leaders) and 12 (with adolescents) focus group discussions were conducted using pretested question guides.

resultsAdolescent SRH needs were perceived to be unique and special due to their vulnerability, fragility and predisposition to explore new experiences. Recurring adolescent SRH needs were: SRH education and counselling; access to contraceptive services and information. These needs were perceived to vary based on sex, schooling and marital status. Adolescent girls were perceived to have more psychological needs, and more prone to negative health outcomes. Out-of-school adolescents were described as more vulnerable, less controlled, less supervised and more prone to sexual abuse. Unmarried adolescents were perceived more vulnerable to sexual exploitation and risks, while married were perceived to have more maternal health service needs.

conclusionsPerceptions of adolescents' SRH needs converge among stakeholders (including adolescents) and are thought to vary by gender, schooling and marital status. This calls for well-designed gender-responsive interventions that also take into consideration other social stratifiers and adolescent's perceived SRH intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Reproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNigeriaQualitative ResearchReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINESEXUAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID35676003
PMCPMC9185505
OpenAlexW4282937810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.