Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35676001›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

Systematic review of educational interventions to improve the menstrual health of young adolescent girls.

Rebecca Lane Evans, Bronwyn Harris, Chinwe Onuegbu, Frances Griffiths

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Period Poverty in Brazil: A Public Health Emergency.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Adolescent menstrual health must go beyond pads.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca Lane EvansDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK rebecca.r.evans@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8002-9342
Bronwyn HarrisDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Chinwe OnuegbuDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6372-9390
Frances GriffithsDivision of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4173-1438
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically review interventions that include an element of menstrual education delivered to young adolescent girls.

designThis was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Selected articles were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool quality appraisal checklist. A meta-analysis was conducted on a subset of articles, and the effect size of the intervention was calculated using Cohen's d. A logic model was constructed to frame the effect of menstrual education interventions on menstrual health.

settingPapers reporting on interventions in high-income and low-income and middle-income countries were sought. INFORMATION SOURCES: Seven electronic databases were searched for English-language entries that were published between January 2014 and May 2020.

participantsThe interventions were aimed at younger adolescent girls aged 10-14 years old.

interventionsThe interventions were designed to improve the menstrual health of the recipients, by addressing one or more elements of menstrual knowledge, attitude or practices (KAP). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Interventions that had not been evaluated were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The most common type of output was a difference in knowledge or skill score ascertained from a pre and post test. Some studies measured additional outcomes, such as attitude or confidence.

resultsTwenty-four eligible studies were identified. The number of participants varied from 1 to 2564. All studies reported improvements in menstrual KAP. The meta-analysis indicates that larger effect sizes were attained by those that encouraged discussion than those that distributed pamphlets.

conclusionsEducation interventions are effective in increasing the menstrual knowledge of young adolescent girls and skills training improves competency to manage menstruation more hygienically and comfortably. Interactive interventions are more motivating than didactic or written. Sharing concerns gives girls confidence and helps them to gain agency on the path to menstrual health. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: For this review, a protocol was not prepared or registered.

Indexed as

IncomeMenstruationAdolescentAttitudeChildEducational StatusFemaleHumansSurveys and Questionnaireshealth policypreventive medicinepublic healthreproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35676001
PMCPMC9185475
OpenAlexW4282007854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.