Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675967›Full record

ReviewPsyCh journal2022

The application of technology to improve cognition in older adults: A review and suggestions for future directions.

Carole Leung, Kai Chun Wong, Winnie W Y So, Zita C K Tse, Duo Li, Yuan Cao, David H K Shum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PsyCh journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smart Glasses for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Fine Tuning of an Advanced Planner for Cognitive Training of Older Adults.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carole LeungFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0577-5804
Kai Chun WongDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-7951
Winnie W Y SoFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-7327
Zita C K TseDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-7982
Duo LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-4827
Yuan CaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-9253
David H K ShumDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4810-9262

Funding

Endowed Professorship in NeuropsychologyHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme N_PolyU540/20Research Matching Grant SchemeStart-up Fund for RAPs P0038412University Grants CommitteeZheng Ge Ru Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly increasing worldwide population of older adults, along with the increasing prevalence of cognitive impairment and dementia in this population, is a growing health-care problem. As such, advances in technology-based cognitive interventions and games are playing an increasingly key role in preserving and improving older adults' cognitive function, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic when opportunities for face-to-face activities or training are few. In this paper, we summarize from previous studies systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the various types of technology used in cognitive interventions (namely, computerized cognitive training, virtual-reality interventions and robot-assisted interventions) and the empirical evidence on the effects of these technologies on global and specific cognitive functions in healthy and clinical populations of older adults (e.g., older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia). We also describe older adults' perceptions, experiences and acceptance of these technologies. Finally, we discuss the limitations, challenges and future avenues of research in this field.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaAgedCognitionHumansPandemicsTechnologycognitioncognitive interventionsolder adultsrobottechnologyvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35675967
PMCPMC9543085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.