ArticleSaudi medical journal2022
Complete blood cells count abnormalities in COVID-19 patients and their prognostic significance: Single center study in Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age influences blood cell-based immune deregulation antibody response and unfavorable clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Dependent Modulation in Vital Components of the Serum Profile of Severely SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Predictors of mortality and ICU requirement in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with diabetes: A multicentre study.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Laboratory Characteristics on SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2023Article
- Association between the overall burden of comorbidity and Ct values among the older patients with Omicron infection: Mediated by inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the role of different peripheral blood count parameters as a cheap and rapid test in determination of coronavirus disease -19 (COVID-19) severity and patients' outcome.
methodsThe data of 462 confirmed COVID-19 patients who attended at the Security Force Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, from October 2020 to March 2021 was retrospectively reviewed and C. Patients with viral infection and respiratory diseases other than COVID-19 were excluded from the study. Complete blood count parameters were compared in accordance with the severity of the clinical presentation, age, and disease outcome.
resultsA total of 277 (60%) were male and 185 (40%) female. Clinically, 32 (6.9%) had severe illness and 430 (93.1%) showed moderate clinical disease. Organ failure occurred in 2.8% of the patients. There was significant leucocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, high neutrophil-lymphocyte (N/L) ratio, and anemia in patients with severe COVID-19 diseases as well as in non-survivors' cases (
conclusionLeucocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, and high N/L ratio together with elevated serum level of ferritin and CRP are eminent features of COVID-19 severity. The inclusion of these parameters in the regimens for patients' categorization on admission will enable early effective intervention and proper decision making during clinical case management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.