Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675713›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling Using Generalized AMBER Force-Field Topologies: Application to Relative Hydration Free-Energy Calculations for Large Sets of Molecules.

Salomé R Rieder, Benjamin Ries, Kay Schaller, Candide Champion, Emilia P Barros, Philippe H Hünenberger, Sereina Riniker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alchemical Enhanced Sampling with Optimized Phase Space Overlap.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salomé R RiederLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8036-651X
Benjamin RiesLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0945-8304
Kay SchallerLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Candide ChampionLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6982-1569
Emilia P BarrosLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-260X
Philippe H HünenbergerLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-7998
Sereina RinikerLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1893-4031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free-energy differences between pairs of end-states can be estimated based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using standard pathway-dependent methods such as thermodynamic integration (TI), free-energy perturbation, or Bennett's acceptance ratio. Replica-exchange enveloping distribution sampling (RE-EDS), on the other hand, allows for the sampling of multiple end-states in a single simulation without the specification of any pathways. In this work, we use the RE-EDS method as implemented in GROMOS together with generalized AMBER force-field (GAFF) topologies, converted to a GROMOS-compatible format with a newly developed GROMOS++ program

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationWaterThermodynamicsWater

Identifiers

PMID35675713
PMCPMC9241072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.