Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675608›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2022

Comprehension of an Over-the-Counter Drug Facts Label Prototype for a Mifepristone and Misoprostol Medication Abortion Product.

M Antonia Biggs, Katherine Ehrenreich, Natalie Morris, Kelly Blanchard, Claudie Kiti Bustamante, Sung Yeon Choimorrow, Debra Hauser, Yamani Hernandez, Nathalie Kapp, Tammi Kromenaker and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Self-Managed Abortion in the United States.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

M Antonia BiggsAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California; Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Black Women for Wellness, Los Angeles, California; the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum, Chicago, Illinois; Advocates for Youth, Washington, DC; the National Network of Abortion Funds, Boston, Massachusetts; International Planned Parenthood, London, United Kingdom; the Red River Women's Clinic, Fargo, North Dakota; the Pegasus Health Justice Center, Dallas, Texas; Physicians for Reproductive Health, New York, New York; Gynuity Health Projects, Tacoma, Washington; California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Los Angeles, California; and the Steve Hicks School of Social Work and Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Katherine Ehrenreich
Natalie Morris
Kelly Blanchard
Claudie Kiti Bustamante
Sung Yeon Choimorrow
Debra Hauser
Yamani Hernandez
Nathalie Kapp
Tammi Kromenaker
Ghazaleh Moayedi
Jamila B Perritt
Lauren Ralph
Elizabeth G Raymond
Ena Suseth Valladares
Kari White
Daniel Grossman
Advocates for Youth · US

Funding

UCSF/Kaiser-DOR Program for Developing Independent Women's Health ResearchersK12HD052163 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER, NANCY E, BRINDIS, CLAIRE D. · 2005 to 2023
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a drug facts label prototype for a combination mifepristone and misoprostol product and to conduct a label-comprehension study to assess understanding of key label concepts.

methodsWe followed U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance, engaged a multidisciplinary group of experts, and conducted cognitive interviews to develop a drug facts label prototype for medication abortion. To assess label comprehension, we developed 11 primary and 13 secondary communication objectives related to indications for use, eligibility, dosing regimen, contraindications, warning signs, side effects, and recognizing the risk of treatment failure, with corresponding target performance thresholds (80-90% accuracy). We conducted individual structured video interviews with people with a uterus aged 12-49 years, recruited through social media. Participants reviewed the drug facts label and responded to questions to assess their understanding of each communication objective. After transcribing and coding interviews, we estimated the proportion of correct responses and exact binomial 95% CIs by age and literacy group.

resultsWe interviewed 851 people (of 1,507 people scheduled); responses from 844 were eligible for analysis, and 35.7% (n=301) of participants were aged 12-17 years. The overall sample met performance criteria for 10 of the 11 primary communication objectives (93-99% correct) related to indications for use, eligibility for use, the dosing regimen, and contraindications; young people met nine and people with limited literacy met eight of the 11 performance criteria. Only 79% (95% CI 0.76-0.82) of the overall sample understood to contact a health care professional if little or no bleeding occurred soon after taking misoprostol, not meeting the prespecified threshold of 85.0%.

conclusionOverall, high levels of comprehension suggest that people can understand most key drug facts label concepts for a medication abortion product without clinical supervision and recommend minor modifications.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedMisoprostolAdolescentComprehensionFemaleHumansMifepristoneNonprescription DrugsPregnancyMifepristoneMisoprostolNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID35675608
PMCPMC9202002
OpenAlexW4282039506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.