ArticleACS nano2022
Nanoengineered Ink for Designing 3D Printable Flexible Bioelectronics.
Article in ACS nano, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing the Next Generation of Biomaterials through Nanoengineering.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Next-generation health monitoring: The role of nanomaterials in 3D-printed wearable devices.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2025Article
- Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Biomedical Applications: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Review
- Two dimensional MoSNature communications · 2025Article
- Microenvironment-responsive nanomedicines: a promising direction for tissue regeneration.Military Medical Research · 2024Review
- Global trends in clinical trials involving engineered biomaterials.Science advances · 2024Review
- Resorbable conductive materials for optimally interfacing medical devices with the living.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Dynamically crosslinked thermoresponsive granular hydrogels.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2023Article
- Recent advances in 3D printable conductive hydrogel inks for neural engineering.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Out of Box Thinking to Tangible Science: A Benchmark History of 3D Bio-Printing in Regenerative Medicine and Tissues Engineering.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Technology Roadmap for Flexible Sensors.ACS nano · 2023Review
- Nano-bio interactions of 2D molybdenum disulfide.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Designing Cost-Effective Open-Source Multihead 3D Bioprinters.GEN biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible electronics require elastomeric and conductive biointerfaces with native tissue-like mechanical properties. The conventional approaches to engineer such a biointerface often utilize conductive nanomaterials in combination with polymeric hydrogels that are cross-linked using toxic photoinitiators. Moreover, these systems frequently demonstrate poor biocompatibility and face trade-offs between conductivity and mechanical stiffness under physiological conditions. To address these challenges, we developed a class of shear-thinning hydrogels as biomaterial inks for 3D printing flexible bioelectronics. These hydrogels are engineered through a facile vacancy-driven gelation of MoS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.