Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35675469›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2022

Effects of omecamtiv mecarbil in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction according to blood pressure: the GALACTIC-HF trial.

Marco Metra, Matteo Pagnesi, Brian L Claggett, Rafael Díaz, G Michael Felker, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon, Diana Bonderman, James C Fang, Cândida Fonseca and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Heart failure evidence update 2026.Heart failure reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. High-intensity care for GDMT titration.Heart failure reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Identification of a Missense Mutation in theJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Marco MetraCardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-8568
Matteo PagnesiCardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9298-7871
Brian L ClaggettDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4215-9218
Rafael DíazEstudios Clinicos Latino America (ECLA), Rosario, Argentina.
G Michael FelkerDivision of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5931-1239
John J V McMurrayBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6317-3975
Scott D SolomonDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-9597
Diana BondermanMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-5924
James C FangUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-9504
Cândida FonsecaHospital S. Francisco Xavier, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-5956
Eva GoncalvesovaFaculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0001-9969-6738
Jonathan G HowlettDivision of Cardiology, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0535-9771
Jing LiNational Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8840-8638
Eileen O'MearaMontreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Zi Michael MiaoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2377-1444
Siddique A AbbasiAmgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9601-7565
Stephen B HeitnerCytokinetics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-1474
Stuart KupferCytokinetics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5469-1287
Fady I MalikCytokinetics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-5759
John R TeerlinkSection of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9527-0852
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCytokinetics (United States) · USUniversity of Brescia · ITAmgen (United States) · USBritish Heart Foundation · GBCentro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental · PTChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNComenius University Bratislava · SKDuke University · USEstudios Clínicos Latinoamérica · ARMedical University of Vienna · ATMontreal Heart Institute · CASan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPatients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low systolic blood pressure (SBP) have high mortality, hospitalizations, and poorly tolerate evidence-based medical treatment. Omecamtiv mecarbil may be particularly helpful in such patients. This study examined its efficacy and tolerability in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF). METHODS AND

resultsThe GALACTIC-HF enrolled patients with baseline SBP ≥85 mmHg with a primary outcome of time to cardiovascular death or first heart failure event. In this analysis, patients were divided according to their baseline SBP (≤100 vs. >100 mmHg). Among the 8232 analysed patients, 1473 (17.9%) had baseline SBP ≤100 mmHg and 6759 (82.1%) had SBP >100 mmHg. The primary outcome occurred in 715 (48.5%) and 2415 (35.7%) patients with SBP ≤100 and >100 mmHg, respectively. Patients with lower SBP were at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Omecamtiv mecarbil, compared with placebo, appeared to be more effective in reducing the primary composite endpoint in patients with SBP ≤100 mmHg [hazard ratio (HR), 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-0.94] compared with those with SBP >100 mmHg (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88-1.03; P-value for interaction = 0.051). In both groups, omecamtiv mecarbil did not change SBP values over time and did not increase the risk of adverse events, when compared with placebo.

conclusionIn GALACTIC-HF, risk reduction of heart failure outcomes with omecamtiv mecarbil compared with placebo was large and significant in patients with low SBP. Omecamtiv mecarbil did not affect SBP and was well tolerated independent of SBP values.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, LeftBlood PressureHumansStroke VolumeUreaomecamtiv mecarbilUreaCardiovascular outcomes trialHeart failureInotropeMyotropeOmecamtiv mecarbil

Identifiers

PMID35675469
PMCPMC9769958
OpenAlexW4282930471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.